Upcoming Baptist Union assembly, 16-18 June, Telford UK

HezekiahHezekiah Deckhand, Styx Posts: 33
Ahoy,

The Baptist Union assembly is coming up and I am planning to attend. I've never been to one before (except the zoom ones we did during the pandemic) and I was wondering if anyone has any pre-knowledge about what happens, what your experiences were, what can be said, achieved, voted on, etc etc.
There arent too many details yet about what events are on, although I have heard vague rumours of an emphasis on "mission" and/or "family". Bishop Mike Royal is the main speaker.
«1

Comments

  • Baptist TrainfanBaptist Trainfan Shipmate
    edited March 13
    I've only been once, years ago, so can't be any help - sorry!

    More info here: https://www.baptist.org.uk/Groups/388310/Assembly_2023.aspx
  • Is "family" here in its common meaning or conservative code for attacking LGBT people?
  • ExclamationMarkExclamationMark Deckhand, Styx
    Yep I went to one. It was ok but not great and since then it's been a question of time driven priority. It's also a matter of cost - churches are supposed to pay for Minister and spouse to attend but being in churches where finance was an issue, I couldn't ask that of them.
  • PomonaPomona Shipmate
    Bishop? Do some Baptist organisations have bishops or is he from another denomination?
  • Pomona wrote: »
    Bishop? Do some Baptist organisations have bishops or is he from another denomination?

    Pentecostal, apparently, but also head of Churches Together in England.
  • Pomona wrote: »
    Bishop? Do some Baptist organisations have bishops or is he from another denomination?

    Baptists in Georgia (the country, not the US state) have bishops.
  • Bishops FingerBishops Finger Shipmate
    edited March 14
    I've only been once, years ago, so can't be any help - sorry!

    More info here: https://www.baptist.org.uk/Groups/388310/Assembly_2023.aspx

    That link provides some helpful info on (Pentecostal) Bishop Mike Royal.

    /tangent alert/

    Just out of interest, here's a link to the International Baptist Church in Tbilisi, Georgia:
    https://www.tbsbaptist.com/
  • Just out of interest, here's a link to the International Baptist Church in Tbilisi, Georgia:
    https://www.tbsbaptist.com/

    That appears to be an independent church, rather than part of the Evangelical Baptist Church of Georgia.
  • One of my predecessors here is an honorary Georgian Baptist bbishop.
  • Just out of interest, here's a link to the International Baptist Church in Tbilisi, Georgia:
    https://www.tbsbaptist.com/

    That appears to be an independent church, rather than part of the Evangelical Baptist Church of Georgia.

    Oops. I should have googled further - my bad, and thanks for the correction!
  • HezekiahHezekiah Deckhand, Styx Posts: 33
    Is "family" here in its common meaning or conservative code for attacking LGBT people?

    That depends on what your definition of "common meaning" is (and what you count as "attacking LGBT" people is)
  • Hezekiah wrote: »
    Is "family" here in its common meaning or conservative code for attacking LGBT people?

    That depends on what your definition of "common meaning" is (and what you count as "attacking LGBT" people is)

    I would say that family is usually held to be people related by recent common descent or by marriage, most particularly the subset of those forming a single household.

    In some evangelical circles "family" is code for a family comprising one man, one woman, and the children born to them both, with the explicit denunciation of families that do not conform to this model. Hence the existence of such groups as the "Family Research Council" which is listed as a hate group by the SPLC.
  • PigletPiglet All Saints Host, Circus Host
    Gentle Hostly Oink

    May I remind everyone that this is All Saints, and can we please be wary of straying into Epiphanies territory, such as definitions of "family", LGBT issues, etc?

    Thank you.

    Piglet, AS host
  • Mike Royal is a Pentecostal bishop from, I think, the West Midlands. He is General Secretary of the ecumenical body "Churches Together in England".

    Lynn Green, General Secretary of the Baptist Union, is fond of talking about the denomination as "the Baptist family".
  • HezekiahHezekiah Deckhand, Styx Posts: 33
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Is "family" here in its common meaning or conservative code for attacking LGBT people?

    That depends on what your definition of "common meaning" is (and what you count as "attacking LGBT" people is)

    I would say that family is usually held to be people related by recent common descent or by marriage, most particularly the subset of those forming a single household.

    In some evangelical circles "family" is code for a family comprising one man, one woman, and the children born to them both, with the explicit denunciation of families that do not conform to this model. Hence the existence of such groups as the "Family Research Council" which is listed as a hate group by the SPLC.

    Well this is the Baptist Union of GB, so "family" is more likely to be a different kind of code than that.
  • Baptist TrainfanBaptist Trainfan Shipmate
    edited March 22
    It's code for "We Baptists are all one big happy family".
  • PomonaPomona Shipmate
    Presumably as an assembly there will also be a talk by a local police officer on road safety, a reminder to not run in the corridors, and information about the trip to Dol-y-Moch/Swanage/Drayton Manor (delete as applicable).
  • My wife took her class to Swanage!
  • As I recall Swanage was where Bath & Wells did their clergy continuing education.
  • I bet they didn't do a Nature Walk in Durlston Country Park, though!
  • KarlLBKarlLB Shipmate
    As I recall Swanage was where Bath & Wells did their clergy continuing education.

    Blackadder made "The Bishop of Bath and Wells" forever funny.
  • KarlLB wrote: »
    As I recall Swanage was where Bath & Wells did their clergy continuing education.

    Blackadder made "The Bishop of Bath and Wells" forever funny.

    Particularly as they appointed George Carey to the See not long after the episode was broadcast. Life imitating art. ;)
  • SpikeSpike Admin Emeritus
    KarlLB wrote: »
    As I recall Swanage was where Bath & Wells did their clergy continuing education.

    Blackadder made "The Bishop of Bath and Wells" forever funny.
    Some years ago our area bishop was appointed to the See of Bath and Wells. Our vicar wrote in the parish magazine that he was to become “The Baby Eating Bishop of Bath & Wells”
  • DardaDarda Shipmate
    Our Place is within Bath & Wells and I recall that a previous rector once made reference to Blackadder, but not when the Bishop was present
  • ExclamationMarkExclamationMark Deckhand, Styx
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Is "family" here in its common meaning or conservative code for attacking LGBT people?

    That depends on what your definition of "common meaning" is (and what you count as "attacking LGBT" people is)

    I would say that family is usually held to be people related by recent common descent or by marriage, most particularly the subset of those forming a single household.

    In some evangelical circles "family" is code for a family comprising one man, one woman, and the children born to them both, with the explicit denunciation of families that do not conform to this model. Hence the existence of such groups as the "Family Research Council" which is listed as a hate group by the SPLC.

    Well this is the Baptist Union of GB, so "family" is more likely to be a different kind of code than that.

    It's a kind of code for someone who wants to impose their view of close community life on everyone. Not everyone has had a good experience of birth or adopted families: being an only child examples of brothers/sisters are pretty meaningless and beyond my experience.
  • ExclamationMarkExclamationMark Deckhand, Styx
    Pomona wrote: »
    Presumably as an assembly there will also be a talk by a local police officer on road safety, a reminder to not run in the corridors, and information about the trip to Dol-y-Moch/Swanage/Drayton Manor (delete as applicable).

    That would probably do way more good than the usual diet of these events. There's an overwhelming sense of enforced positivity that means there are always some who feel very much on the outside when things are not going the standard so well for them.
  • I've unfortunately come across that at other Baptist events - it seems to be a mark of a certain kind of evangelicalism. Last autumn's South Wales Baptist Association's gathering was IMO refreshingly down-to-earth and sensible.
  • HezekiahHezekiah Deckhand, Styx Posts: 33
    It's code for "We Baptists are all one big happy family".

    I hardly think that can be the case, in the face of the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
  • HezekiahHezekiah Deckhand, Styx Posts: 33
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Is "family" here in its common meaning or conservative code for attacking LGBT people?

    That depends on what your definition of "common meaning" is (and what you count as "attacking LGBT" people is)

    I would say that family is usually held to be people related by recent common descent or by marriage, most particularly the subset of those forming a single household.

    In some evangelical circles "family" is code for a family comprising one man, one woman, and the children born to them both, with the explicit denunciation of families that do not conform to this model. Hence the existence of such groups as the "Family Research Council" which is listed as a hate group by the SPLC.

    Well this is the Baptist Union of GB, so "family" is more likely to be a different kind of code than that.

    It's a kind of code for someone who wants to impose their view of close community life on everyone. Not everyone has had a good experience of birth or adopted families: being an only child examples of brothers/sisters are pretty meaningless and beyond my experience.

    True, but the statistics quite clearly show that experiences of the alternatives are even worse.
  • HezekiahHezekiah Deckhand, Styx Posts: 33
    Pomona wrote: »
    Presumably as an assembly there will also be a talk by a local police officer on road safety, a reminder to not run in the corridors, and information about the trip to Dol-y-Moch/Swanage/Drayton Manor (delete as applicable).

    That would probably do way more good than the usual diet of these events. There's an overwhelming sense of enforced positivity that means there are always some who feel very much on the outside when things are not going the standard so well for them.

    I've noticed that too. However, I am going to refuse to kow tow to such shallowness. If I dont feel a particular way, I am not going to fake it.
  • Baptist TrainfanBaptist Trainfan Shipmate
    edited March 27
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    It's code for "We Baptists are all one big happy family".

    I hardly think that can be the case, in the face of the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

    Agreed, but it's what some folk would like us to think! Anyway, families have rows.
  • HezekiahHezekiah Deckhand, Styx Posts: 33
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    It's code for "We Baptists are all one big happy family".

    I hardly think that can be the case, in the face of the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

    Agreed, but it's what some folk would like us to think! Anyway, families have rows.

    Oh to be sure. Well, I shall find out in June.
  • Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Is "family" here in its common meaning or conservative code for attacking LGBT people?

    That depends on what your definition of "common meaning" is (and what you count as "attacking LGBT" people is)

    I would say that family is usually held to be people related by recent common descent or by marriage, most particularly the subset of those forming a single household.

    In some evangelical circles "family" is code for a family comprising one man, one woman, and the children born to them both, with the explicit denunciation of families that do not conform to this model. Hence the existence of such groups as the "Family Research Council" which is listed as a hate group by the SPLC.

    Well this is the Baptist Union of GB, so "family" is more likely to be a different kind of code than that.

    It's a kind of code for someone who wants to impose their view of close community life on everyone. Not everyone has had a good experience of birth or adopted families: being an only child examples of brothers/sisters are pretty meaningless and beyond my experience.

    True, but the statistics quite clearly show that experiences of the alternatives are even worse.

    No, they don't.
  • ExclamationMarkExclamationMark Deckhand, Styx
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    It's code for "We Baptists are all one big happy family".

    I hardly think that can be the case, in the face of the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

    Agreed, but it's what some folk would like us to think! Anyway, families have rows.

    Oh to be sure. Well, I shall find out in June.

    I'm not so sure given a recent letter from the Gen Sec. Looks like the BU is taking a leaf from the CofE book and kicking at least one can down the road. In the process it's throwing some of us under a bus since the same conversations have been going on since around 2005 when the first Baptist Minister entered a civil partnership.
  • Yes, the debate has been going on for a stupidly long time yet there are still people saying, "We need more time to think this through". Seems that TPTB are frightened of biting the bullet - or can't decide which bullet to bite.
  • SarasaSarasa All Saints Host
    Just a gentle hostly reminder that this is All Saints. This thread looks in danger of wandering into Epiphanies territory at present.

    Sarasa, All Saint Hosts
  • Noted.
  • HezekiahHezekiah Deckhand, Styx Posts: 33
    edited April 16

    I'm not so sure given a recent letter from the Gen Sec. Looks like the BU is taking a leaf from the CofE book and kicking at least one can down the road. In the process it's throwing some of us under a bus since the same conversations have been going on since around 2005 when the first Baptist Minister entered a civil partnership.

    Its not quite the same though, because of the governmental system of Baptist churches (or more specifically lack of one). The BU has no authority over any of its member churches. It can offer advice, it can make reccomendations, it can give technical support, but in the end each Baptist congregation interprets God's will for itself.

    (ETA fixed code, DT, Temporary Hosting)
  • HezekiahHezekiah Deckhand, Styx Posts: 33
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Is "family" here in its common meaning or conservative code for attacking LGBT people?

    That depends on what your definition of "common meaning" is (and what you count as "attacking LGBT" people is)

    I would say that family is usually held to be people related by recent common descent or by marriage, most particularly the subset of those forming a single household.

    In some evangelical circles "family" is code for a family comprising one man, one woman, and the children born to them both, with the explicit denunciation of families that do not conform to this model. Hence the existence of such groups as the "Family Research Council" which is listed as a hate group by the SPLC.

    Well this is the Baptist Union of GB, so "family" is more likely to be a different kind of code than that.

    It's a kind of code for someone who wants to impose their view of close community life on everyone. Not everyone has had a good experience of birth or adopted families: being an only child examples of brothers/sisters are pretty meaningless and beyond my experience.

    True, but the statistics quite clearly show that experiences of the alternatives are even worse.

    No, they don't.

    Yes, I'm afraid they do.
  • Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Is "family" here in its common meaning or conservative code for attacking LGBT people?

    That depends on what your definition of "common meaning" is (and what you count as "attacking LGBT" people is)

    I would say that family is usually held to be people related by recent common descent or by marriage, most particularly the subset of those forming a single household.

    In some evangelical circles "family" is code for a family comprising one man, one woman, and the children born to them both, with the explicit denunciation of families that do not conform to this model. Hence the existence of such groups as the "Family Research Council" which is listed as a hate group by the SPLC.

    Well this is the Baptist Union of GB, so "family" is more likely to be a different kind of code than that.

    It's a kind of code for someone who wants to impose their view of close community life on everyone. Not everyone has had a good experience of birth or adopted families: being an only child examples of brothers/sisters are pretty meaningless and beyond my experience.

    True, but the statistics quite clearly show that experiences of the alternatives are even worse.

    No, they don't.

    Yes, I'm afraid they do.

    If you'd like to post some evidence for this please feel free to start a thread in an appropriate forum.
  • ExclamationMarkExclamationMark Deckhand, Styx
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Is "family" here in its common meaning or conservative code for attacking LGBT people?

    That depends on what your definition of "common meaning" is (and what you count as "attacking LGBT" people is)

    I would say that family is usually held to be people related by recent common descent or by marriage, most particularly the subset of those forming a single household.

    In some evangelical circles "family" is code for a family comprising one man, one woman, and the children born to them both, with the explicit denunciation of families that do not conform to this model. Hence the existence of such groups as the "Family Research Council" which is listed as a hate group by the SPLC.

    Well this is the Baptist Union of GB, so "family" is more likely to be a different kind of code than that.

    It's a kind of code for someone who wants to impose their view of close community life on everyone. Not everyone has had a good experience of birth or adopted families: being an only child examples of brothers/sisters are pretty meaningless and beyond my experience.

    True, but the statistics quite clearly show that experiences of the alternatives are even worse.

    No, they don't.

    Yes, I'm afraid they do.

    If you are referring to the Declaration of Principle, it's important to remember that God's guidance sits at the heart of it
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Is "family" here in its common meaning or conservative code for attacking LGBT people?

    That depends on what your definition of "common meaning" is (and what you count as "attacking LGBT" people is)

    I would say that family is usually held to be people related by recent common descent or by marriage, most particularly the subset of those forming a single household.

    In some evangelical circles "family" is code for a family comprising one man, one woman, and the children born to them both, with the explicit denunciation of families that do not conform to this model. Hence the existence of such groups as the "Family Research Council" which is listed as a hate group by the SPLC.

    Well this is the Baptist Union of GB, so "family" is more likely to be a different kind of code than that.

    It's a kind of code for someone who wants to impose their view of close community life on everyone. Not everyone has had a good experience of birth or adopted families: being an only child examples of brothers/sisters are pretty meaningless and beyond my experience.

    True, but the statistics quite clearly show that experiences of the alternatives are even worse.

    No, they don't.

    Yes, I'm afraid they do.

    If you are referring to the Declaration of Principle, it's important to remember that God's guidance sits at the heart of it. Any decision that doesn't sit fair and square with scripture is therefore outside the DoP and breaks fellowship with those who do base their decision on the matter, on what scripture teaches.
  • Declaration of Principle:

    The Basis of the Baptist Union is:

    1. That our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, God manifest in the flesh, is the sole and absolute authority in all matters pertaining to faith and practice, as revealed in the Holy
    Scriptures, and that each Church has liberty, under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, to interpret and administer His laws.

    2. That Christian Baptism is the immersion in water into the Name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, of those who have professed repentance towards God and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ who 'died for our sins according to the Scriptures; was buried, and rose again the third day'.

    3. That it is the duty of every disciple to bear personal witness to the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and to take part in the evangelisation of the world.
  • PomonaPomona Shipmate
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Is "family" here in its common meaning or conservative code for attacking LGBT people?

    That depends on what your definition of "common meaning" is (and what you count as "attacking LGBT" people is)

    I would say that family is usually held to be people related by recent common descent or by marriage, most particularly the subset of those forming a single household.

    In some evangelical circles "family" is code for a family comprising one man, one woman, and the children born to them both, with the explicit denunciation of families that do not conform to this model. Hence the existence of such groups as the "Family Research Council" which is listed as a hate group by the SPLC.

    Well this is the Baptist Union of GB, so "family" is more likely to be a different kind of code than that.

    It's a kind of code for someone who wants to impose their view of close community life on everyone. Not everyone has had a good experience of birth or adopted families: being an only child examples of brothers/sisters are pretty meaningless and beyond my experience.

    True, but the statistics quite clearly show that experiences of the alternatives are even worse.

    No, they don't.

    Yes, I'm afraid they do.

    If you are referring to the Declaration of Principle, it's important to remember that God's guidance sits at the heart of it
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Is "family" here in its common meaning or conservative code for attacking LGBT people?

    That depends on what your definition of "common meaning" is (and what you count as "attacking LGBT" people is)

    I would say that family is usually held to be people related by recent common descent or by marriage, most particularly the subset of those forming a single household.

    In some evangelical circles "family" is code for a family comprising one man, one woman, and the children born to them both, with the explicit denunciation of families that do not conform to this model. Hence the existence of such groups as the "Family Research Council" which is listed as a hate group by the SPLC.

    Well this is the Baptist Union of GB, so "family" is more likely to be a different kind of code than that.

    It's a kind of code for someone who wants to impose their view of close community life on everyone. Not everyone has had a good experience of birth or adopted families: being an only child examples of brothers/sisters are pretty meaningless and beyond my experience.

    True, but the statistics quite clearly show that experiences of the alternatives are even worse.

    No, they don't.

    Yes, I'm afraid they do.

    If you are referring to the Declaration of Principle, it's important to remember that God's guidance sits at the heart of it. Any decision that doesn't sit fair and square with scripture is therefore outside the DoP and breaks fellowship with those who do base their decision on the matter, on what scripture teaches.

    @Hezekiah is replying here to @Arethosemyfeet wrt the alternatives to families being worse than families.
  • Nick TamenNick Tamen Shipmate
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Is "family" here in its common meaning or conservative code for attacking LGBT people?

    That depends on what your definition of "common meaning" is (and what you count as "attacking LGBT" people is)

    I would say that family is usually held to be people related by recent common descent or by marriage, most particularly the subset of those forming a single household.

    In some evangelical circles "family" is code for a family comprising one man, one woman, and the children born to them both, with the explicit denunciation of families that do not conform to this model. Hence the existence of such groups as the "Family Research Council" which is listed as a hate group by the SPLC.

    Well this is the Baptist Union of GB, so "family" is more likely to be a different kind of code than that.

    It's a kind of code for someone who wants to impose their view of close community life on everyone. Not everyone has had a good experience of birth or adopted families: being an only child examples of brothers/sisters are pretty meaningless and beyond my experience.

    True, but the statistics quite clearly show that experiences of the alternatives are even worse.

    No, they don't.

    Yes, I'm afraid they do.
    If you are referring to the Declaration of Principle, it's important to remember that God's guidance sits at the heart of it. Any decision that doesn't sit fair and square with scripture is therefore outside the DoP and breaks fellowship with those who do base their decision on the matter, on what scripture teaches.
    But how does that work exactly? The Declaration of Principle, as quoted by @Baptist Trainfan, says
    [t]hat our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, God manifest in the flesh, is the sole and absolute authority in all matters pertaining to faith and practice, as revealed in the Holy Scriptures, and that each Church has liberty, under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, to interpret and administer His laws.
    Under that principle, it would seem that the decision that breaks fellowship under the DoP is the decision that denies the right of another congregation to come to its own conclusion about what Scripture teaches and what Christ requires, even if other congregations disagree with that conclusion. Otherwise, the principle would appear to be that each congregation has the liberty to interpret God’s laws, but only as long as they do so consistently with everyone else.

  • HezekiahHezekiah Deckhand, Styx Posts: 33
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Is "family" here in its common meaning or conservative code for attacking LGBT people?

    That depends on what your definition of "common meaning" is (and what you count as "attacking LGBT" people is)

    I would say that family is usually held to be people related by recent common descent or by marriage, most particularly the subset of those forming a single household.

    In some evangelical circles "family" is code for a family comprising one man, one woman, and the children born to them both, with the explicit denunciation of families that do not conform to this model. Hence the existence of such groups as the "Family Research Council" which is listed as a hate group by the SPLC.

    Well this is the Baptist Union of GB, so "family" is more likely to be a different kind of code than that.

    It's a kind of code for someone who wants to impose their view of close community life on everyone. Not everyone has had a good experience of birth or adopted families: being an only child examples of brothers/sisters are pretty meaningless and beyond my experience.

    True, but the statistics quite clearly show that experiences of the alternatives are even worse.

    No, they don't.

    Yes, I'm afraid they do.

    If you'd like to post some evidence for this please feel free to start a thread in an appropriate forum.

    Sure will do. Which forum would you consider appropriate?
  • PigletPiglet All Saints Host, Circus Host
    edited April 25
    Gentle Hostly Oink

    I think if you're talking about family values and suchlike, then Epiphanies would be most appropriate. Bear in mind the rules of the board when you get there.

    Thank you.

    Piglet, AS host
  • HezekiahHezekiah Deckhand, Styx Posts: 33
    Under that principle, it would seem that the decision that breaks fellowship under the DoP is the decision that denies the right of another congregation to come to its own conclusion about what Scripture teaches and what Christ requires, even if other congregations disagree with that conclusion. Otherwise, the principle would appear to be that each congregation has the liberty to interpret God’s laws, but only as long as they do so consistently with everyone else.

    Your first interpretation is the correct one, but you put it in a confrontational way. No one in the Baptist family is denying the right of any other congregation to come to its own conclusions about what scripture teaches or what Christ requires. Baptist churches have autonomy, but that cuts both ways. If another congregation, under Christ, believe the authenticity of that interpretation is invalid, they have a perfect right to express that belief.
  • HezekiahHezekiah Deckhand, Styx Posts: 33
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Is "family" here in its common meaning or conservative code for attacking LGBT people?

    That depends on what your definition of "common meaning" is (and what you count as "attacking LGBT" people is)

    I would say that family is usually held to be people related by recent common descent or by marriage, most particularly the subset of those forming a single household.

    In some evangelical circles "family" is code for a family comprising one man, one woman, and the children born to them both, with the explicit denunciation of families that do not conform to this model. Hence the existence of such groups as the "Family Research Council" which is listed as a hate group by the SPLC.

    Well this is the Baptist Union of GB, so "family" is more likely to be a different kind of code than that.

    It's a kind of code for someone who wants to impose their view of close community life on everyone. Not everyone has had a good experience of birth or adopted families: being an only child examples of brothers/sisters are pretty meaningless and beyond my experience.

    True, but the statistics quite clearly show that experiences of the alternatives are even worse.

    No, they don't.

    Yes, I'm afraid they do.

    If you are referring to the Declaration of Principle, it's important to remember that God's guidance sits at the heart of it
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Is "family" here in its common meaning or conservative code for attacking LGBT people?

    That depends on what your definition of "common meaning" is (and what you count as "attacking LGBT" people is)

    I would say that family is usually held to be people related by recent common descent or by marriage, most particularly the subset of those forming a single household.

    In some evangelical circles "family" is code for a family comprising one man, one woman, and the children born to them both, with the explicit denunciation of families that do not conform to this model. Hence the existence of such groups as the "Family Research Council" which is listed as a hate group by the SPLC.

    Well this is the Baptist Union of GB, so "family" is more likely to be a different kind of code than that.

    It's a kind of code for someone who wants to impose their view of close community life on everyone. Not everyone has had a good experience of birth or adopted families: being an only child examples of brothers/sisters are pretty meaningless and beyond my experience.

    True, but the statistics quite clearly show that experiences of the alternatives are even worse.

    No, they don't.

    Yes, I'm afraid they do.

    If you are referring to the Declaration of Principle, it's important to remember that God's guidance sits at the heart of it. Any decision that doesn't sit fair and square with scripture is therefore outside the DoP and breaks fellowship with those who do base their decision on the matter, on what scripture teaches.

    I wasn't referring to that, as it happens.
  • Nick TamenNick Tamen Shipmate
    Hezekiah wrote: »
    Under that principle, it would seem that the decision that breaks fellowship under the DoP is the decision that denies the right of another congregation to come to its own conclusion about what Scripture teaches and what Christ requires, even if other congregations disagree with that conclusion. Otherwise, the principle would appear to be that each congregation has the liberty to interpret God’s laws, but only as long as they do so consistently with everyone else.

    Your first interpretation is the correct one, but you put it in a confrontational way. No one in the Baptist family is denying the right of any other congregation to come to its own conclusions about what scripture teaches or what Christ requires. Baptist churches have autonomy, but that cuts both ways. If another congregation, under Christ, believe the authenticity of that interpretation is invalid, they have a perfect right to express that belief.
    I didn’t mean for it to be confrontational, and I apologize if it I came across that way. I was just trying to square what @ExclamationMark said that I quoted:
    If you are referring to the Declaration of Principle, it's important to remember that God's guidance sits at the heart of it. Any decision that doesn't sit fair and square with scripture is therefore outside the DoP and breaks fellowship with those who do base their decision on the matter, on what scripture teaches.
    with what @Baptist Trainfan quoted from the Declaration of Principle.

  • HezekiahHezekiah Deckhand, Styx Posts: 33
    Piglet wrote: »
    Gentle Hostly Oink

    I think if you're talking about family values and suchlike, then Epiphanies would be most appropriate. Bear in mind the rules of the board when you get there.

    Thank you.

    Piglet, AS host

    Tragically, I cannot post in Epiphanies. I think I'm still suspended for violating the echo chamber restrictions.
Sign In or Register to comment.