Good report. Saint C’s checks off all the boxes in a good way. If I lived closer this would definitely be my home parish. Yes, Fr [name retracted]’s Masses tend to…. erm go on for a bit. So if you find yourself in Boston and you’re looking for a ‘Golfer’s Special’ a Sunday morning Mass right at 30 minutes, try nearby St Francis Chapel at the Prudential Center. The OVM priests will have you in and out in a jiff.
Back to the report. boston-irish, do you have any comment on the make-up of the congregation please? The MW describes it as "(a) diverse congregation in every way except race" by which I gather it is almost entirely white.
Interpolationist - what a lovely word! I shall apply it immediately to Father-In-Charge at Our Place, as he has a similar habit of commenting, explaining etc., so that our Sunday service is at least twenty minutes longer than it need be...
Re: Diversity. As I said this is not my home parish. But as I’ve noticed from visiting other churches in the area (TECUSA) the congregations are largely white with little or no diversity. The Back Bay and Beacon Hill areas of Boston could hardly be called diverse. They are as WASPy as you can get. The fact that there is a Catholic church in the area is remarkable in and of itself. Another thing, people who live in Boston proper walk to church or take the subway. They don’t drive, there’s no parking anyway. There are Catholic Churches in other parts of the city that reflect the makeup of the neighborhood. We still have many churches that are still all Italian, Portuguese, French, Irish, etc. We are slowly making progress in the diversity department. We just elected a woman of color as mayor. Baby steps.
Sorry if I offend you, but I just don't understand the mentality. If you disagree with Catholic moral teaching, no one is keeping you there. I just really get uncomfrtable when people try to present Catholic Christianity as something it is not. It's dishonest, and in my view, leads people astray from the (yes, difficult) truth.
Last comment before you and I get done for derailing the thread:
I note a lot of selective thinking on the part of them as challenges the orthodoxy of their fellow-Christians, in particular with an undue preoccupation with other people’s sex lives.
You’ve strayed into Dead Horse territory, you have.
Really very few preachers indeed can sustain 22 minutes of decent sermon. And I dont believe any congregation should have to endure less than outstanding preaching that long. Why not stick to 8 minutes of clear exposition on the readings - especially when they are the End Time texts, as here. That way the congregation members are more likely to remember something of the preacher's words.
The Reporter did note that the first 15 minutes of the sermon were the best! Presumably 8 minutes would not have been long enough for the priest to say what he felt led by the Spirit to say...
Really very few preachers indeed can sustain 22 minutes of decent sermon. And I dont believe any congregation should have to endure less than outstanding preaching that long. Why not stick to 8 minutes of clear exposition on the readings - especially when they are the End Time texts, as here. That way the congregation members are more likely to remember something of the preacher's words.
We'd allow 10 minutes - a bit of time at the start to say how they did (or did not) fit together and to explain any unfamiliar words/allusions. Then 8 minutes or so on the Gospel passage, what it says and what message and lesson can we take from it. Then a minute to wind up. A sermon should not be a display of Bibliology.
Really very few preachers indeed can sustain 22 minutes of decent sermon. And I dont believe any congregation should have to endure less than outstanding preaching that long. Why not stick to 8 minutes of clear exposition on the readings - especially when they are the End Time texts, as here. That way the congregation members are more likely to remember something of the preacher's words.
Here we go yet again with this recurring discussion on the Ship.
This very much depends on the church tradition and what is expected of the sermon in various traditions, as well as expectations of the worshippers in a given community. Sermons of approximately 20 minutes are very much the norm in my tradition, and there are very many preachers who are quite capable of sustaining decent and often excellent sermons for that period of time.
Back to the MW Report, and what would turn me off this church far more than a long sermon (even if most of it was of good quality) is the priest's habit of *interpolating* his own bits into the liturgy.
Such *interpolation* is An Abomination Before The Lord. We get it at Our Place, with several mini-sermons scattered throughout the service, making a wordy liturgy even wordier. And loooooooooooooonger...
Now that I agree with completely! The Holy Spirit did not dictate the Roman Missal, or its derivatives, to faithful scribes only to have it toyed with.
Now that I agree with completely! The Holy Spirit did not dictate the Roman Missal, or its derivatives, to faithful scribes only to have it toyed with.
O dear. The priest is no doubt a lovely, well intentioned man and I will sound like a pedantic grump for saying this, but here goes.
At the greeting the priest and people recognise each other’s presence and so constitute the church in that place. That is why it is said before anything else, priest and people equally participating.
To precede the greeting with lots of “Hello campers!” stuff reduces it to mere mumbo jumbo. It means a passive congregation is dependent on a didactic priest. The effect is clericalist and patronising, although I expect most people won’t notice and it is the opposite of what the priest intends with his efforts to be friendly.
I could (and will) say much the same about Our Place's FatherInCharge.
The Greeting is preceded by a mini-sermon and welcome, and followed by the first hymn, during which FInC (a lovely man, and a prayerful pastor) marches in for the second time...
🙄
O dear. The priest is no doubt a lovely, well intentioned man and I will sound like a pedantic grump for saying this, but here goes.
At the greeting the priest and people recognise each other’s presence and so constitute the church in that place. That is why it is said before anything else, priest and people equally participating.
To precede the greeting with lots of “Hello campers!” stuff reduces it to mere mumbo jumbo. It means a passive congregation is dependent on a didactic priest. The effect is clericalist and patronising, although I expect most people won’t notice and it is the opposite of what the priest intends with his efforts to be friendly.
I’m sure he’s a lovely man.
I agree.
At ours there is the official greeting as dictated from the Holy Spirit via a white dove bearing a golden quill, and then we get the other stuff (theme for the day, any special mentions etc)
So all is fitting and seemly just as Our Lady of the Blessed Tabernacle Key would have it.
Any further mention of the practices at other churches will make you-know-who do you-know-what. And the Holy Spirit, having taken the form of a dove, will do what all birds do in abundance.
[Ending said invocation by intoning Veni Sancte Spiritus]
Comments
Back to the report. boston-irish, do you have any comment on the make-up of the congregation please? The MW describes it as "(a) diverse congregation in every way except race" by which I gather it is almost entirely white.
I note a lot of selective thinking on the part of them as challenges the orthodoxy of their fellow-Christians, in particular with an undue preoccupation with other people’s sex lives.
You’ve strayed into Dead Horse territory, you have.
Now back to Mystery Worshipping….
@Amanda B Reckondwyth
Lead Editor, Mystery Worship
We'd allow 10 minutes - a bit of time at the start to say how they did (or did not) fit together and to explain any unfamiliar words/allusions. Then 8 minutes or so on the Gospel passage, what it says and what message and lesson can we take from it. Then a minute to wind up. A sermon should not be a display of Bibliology.
This very much depends on the church tradition and what is expected of the sermon in various traditions, as well as expectations of the worshippers in a given community. Sermons of approximately 20 minutes are very much the norm in my tradition, and there are very many preachers who are quite capable of sustaining decent and often excellent sermons for that period of time.
@Amanda B Reckondwyth
Lead Editor, Mystery Worship
Back to the MW Report, and what would turn me off this church far more than a long sermon (even if most of it was of good quality) is the priest's habit of *interpolating* his own bits into the liturgy.
Such *interpolation* is An Abomination Before The Lord. We get it at Our Place, with several mini-sermons scattered throughout the service, making a wordy liturgy even wordier. And loooooooooooooonger...
(But not during Mass, if you please).
Loving the irony.
I assume nobody actually believes the Holy Spirit dictated the Roman Missal, therefore it is a human construct and theirs to change.
At the greeting the priest and people recognise each other’s presence and so constitute the church in that place. That is why it is said before anything else, priest and people equally participating.
To precede the greeting with lots of “Hello campers!” stuff reduces it to mere mumbo jumbo. It means a passive congregation is dependent on a didactic priest. The effect is clericalist and patronising, although I expect most people won’t notice and it is the opposite of what the priest intends with his efforts to be friendly.
I’m sure he’s a lovely man.
The Greeting is preceded by a mini-sermon and welcome, and followed by the first hymn, during which FInC (a lovely man, and a prayerful pastor) marches in for the second time...
🙄
I agree.
At ours there is the official greeting as dictated from the Holy Spirit via a white dove bearing a golden quill, and then we get the other stuff (theme for the day, any special mentions etc)
So all is fitting and seemly just as Our Lady of the Blessed Tabernacle Key would have it.
Any further mention of the practices at other churches will make you-know-who do you-know-what. And the Holy Spirit, having taken the form of a dove, will do what all birds do in abundance.
[Ending said invocation by intoning Veni Sancte Spiritus]
@Amanda B Reckondwyth
Lead Editor, Mystery Worship
@Amanda B Reckondwyth
Lead Editor, Mystery Worship