Ship of Fools: Apostles Lutheran, Peoria, Arizona, USA


imageShip of Fools: Apostles Lutheran, Peoria, Arizona, USA

A pleasure to sing along to the music, but where did everyone go?

Read the full Mystery Worshipper report here


Comments

  • Bishops FingerBishops Finger Shipmate
    edited September 2018
    On first reading, I wondered if those who left after the piano solo had stayed on from the earlier service, until I checked the church website, and found that the earlier 'liturgical' service was at the ungodly hour of 8am!

    How odd...could they be 'groupies', present only for that performance at the beginning of the service? But that can't be so, if they left as he began - maybe they were anticipating something/someone different/better (delete as appropriate).

    A congregation of 30 or so at what in the UK would be the principal service of the day seems a bit thin - almost standard UK Anglican size!

    We don't have many Lutheran churches in the UK, so I'm not too clear as to the distinctions between them elsewhere. Are the Missouri Synod churches not in communion with (say) the Anglican churches?

    BTW, I do like the way the MW reports can be linked to comments - very efficient and workmanlike. All Involved Shall Have Prizes.

    IJ
  • edited September 2018
    The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America is in communion with The Episcopal Church, hence I would assume with the Anglicans. The Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod is not in communion with the Episcopalians. Neither, I gather, do they think very much of other Lutherans. They are more conservative than the Evangelicals.

    To confuse the matter further, the Evangelical Lutheran Church-Wisconsin Synod is not in communion with the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America either.

    And let's not talk about the Laestadian Lutherans, who seem to be in a world of their own.

    As for the people who left, my best guess is that they headed over to the Spanish service that was taking place in the parish hall at the same time as the 10:45 English service in the sanctuary. I couldn't hear what they were saying as they visited before the service, so I don't know if they were speaking Spanish or English. I'm guessing that they were visiting with their English-speaking fellow parishioners and then took off for their own service. It just struck me as odd that they all got up together in a bunch just as the pianist began his solo -- like a flock of birds frightened into flight.
  • GrenacheGrenache Shipmate Posts: 14
    The full communion agreement between the Episcopal Church and ELCA does not extend to other Lutheran or Anglican churches. The Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada and the Anglican Church in Canada are in full communion, and I read at one point that the four churches were working on bringing all four bodies into full communion. The only other Lutheran church that TEC is in full communion with is the Church of Sweden. And it's worth noting that the Wisconsin Synod and and Missouri Synod are not in communion with each other. There were a few years back discussions between Missouri Synod and the Anglican Church in North America, but I don't know what, if anything, became of them.
  • O dear - see how these Christians love each other!

    But thanks for the clarification(?)

    Miss Amanda, I'd noticed that the Spanish service started at the same time (1045am), so ISWYM. An odd situation, nevertheless.

    IJ
  • AIUI, the ECLA is the most liberal of the 3 when it comes to dead-horse issues; the Missouri Synod much less so and the Wisconsin even less again.
  • Thanks!

    IJ
  • GrenacheGrenache Shipmate Posts: 14
    ELCA is also the most ecumenically active; they have full communion agreements with the Northern and Southern Provinces of the Moravian Church, the Presbyterian Church USA, the United Church of Christ, the Reformed Church in America, the United Methodist Church, and the Episcopal Church.
  • Bishops FingerBishops Finger Shipmate
    edited September 2018
    I know the C of E is in communion with most of the Scandinavian Lutheran churches (with the odd exception of Latvia, IIRC), to the extent that we now have a Swedish priest (i.e. ordained in the Church of Sweden - Ostersund Cathedral, I think) ministering in our local town-centre UPA parish. I'm sure there are other Lutherans in the C of E elsewhere.

    This is getting a bit off-topic, perhaps, but it does seem a shame that the Lutherans have much the same sort of dead-horse divisions as we Anglicans!

    Back to the MW Report - it would be interesting to know how many faithful attended the 8am service, and the 1045am Spanish service.

    IJ
  • I am of a mind to drop in on the 8:00 service. I really did like this church, and I'm curious to see how they handle "liturgical" worship -- and how many are in attendance.

    I am told the Spanish pastor is a native Mexican, so I think it's likely that I wouldn't understand his Spanish unless he spoke slowly. I may pop my head in some Sunday just to see what it's like -- no guarantee that I would stay.
  • john holdingjohn holding Shipmate, Host Emeritus
    I know the C of E is in communion with most of the Scandinavian Lutheran churches (with the odd exception of Latvia, IIRC), to the extent that we now have a Swedish priest (i.e. ordained in the Church of Sweden - Ostersund Cathedral, I think) ministering in our local town-centre UPA parish. I'm sure there are other Lutherans in the C of E elsewhere.

    IJ

    Our shipmate Leaf is ordained in the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada and for several years served as rector (we don't have vicars here in Canada) of an Anglican parish.
  • The degree of communion between TEC and ECLA is show by the agreement that at the consecration by either of a bishop, at least one of the consecrating bishops will be from the other church - much to be commended. The Porvoo agreement is not as close.

    Alas, few signs of a similar agreement here. Certainly not on as far as the Sydney diocese is concerned and I don't know if the others hav seriously considered it. Then, the Lutherans are a vey small community and are not all that outward looking either.
  • There is a largeish Lutheran population down here, enough for schools and aged care homes. I should take a visit one day.

    Did they sit to sing and stand to pray as the German Lutheran church I visited did?
  • ClimacusClimacus Shipmate
    edited September 2018
    Oh, and who do I bribe to find out the alternative name of 'Earth and all stars’?
    :smile:
  • That's interesting and a community I had not known of. SA of course (but even there, the Lutheran population is not all that large and (despite tourist brochures assertions to the contrary) we've found very little German heritage remaining in Hahndorf or the Barossa. Then there is the community in Queensland, but not terribly large ones elsewhere.
  • Climacus wrote: »
    Oh, and who do I bribe to find out the alternative name of 'Earth and all stars’?
    :smile:

    hymnary.org
  • I find the Laestadian Lutheran community here in the USA rather interesting. You can search for Laestadian Lutheran on the new MW home page. (I don't know how to link to a report under the new software.)
  • Yur tiz, courtesy of The Fount Of All Pedia Knowledge:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laestadian_Lutheran_Church

    Once again, the Ship proves itself to be an Instrument Of Education. I know little of the Lutheran churches worldwide (though I have visited, and MWed, a congregation in London), and find the variations most interesting.

    I suppose the Lutheran church (in general) is actually senior to my own Dearly Beloved Church of England!

    IJ

  • PDRPDR Shipmate
    edited June 2019
    I have never met an ELCA pastor who did not have a naughty story about LCMS, or an LCMS who did not have one about the WELS. The one group that did not get mentioned, that is of some age, is the Little Norwegian Synod - or to give it its Sunday name, the Evangelical Lutheran Synod - which is the Scandinavian version of WELS. If Miss Amanda wants to check them out they have a parish on Jomax Road in north Phoenix. The pastor there is a friend of a friend which is how I know.
  • Indeed they do. "Be vigilant, for you know neither the day nor the hour."
  • A useful way to think of it may be to note that those Lutheran churches that are in full communion with one or more Anglican churches are all members of the Lutheran World Federation.* The Missouri Synod, Wisconsin Synod, and Laestadian Lutherans are not members of the LWF.

    Life being what it is, there are other anomalies. Where I live, the most visible of these is that the American Episcopal Church, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, and the Moravian Church in America are all in full communion with one another. However, the ELCA is also in full communion with the Presbyterian Church (USA), the United Methodist Church, and the Reformed Church of America and the United Church of Christ. None of the latter groups is in full communion with TEC, and only the UMC is in communion with the Moravians.


    *To wit, the Churches of Sweden, Denmark, Norway, and Iceland , along with the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Lithuania, and the Estonian Evangelical Lutheran Church, are all members of the LWF the Porvoo Communion (which puts them in full Communion with the Churches of England and Ireland, as well as the Scottish Episcopal Church). The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America is also a member of the LWF and is in full communion with the American Episcopal Church. Likewise, in Canada, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada is a member of the LWF and in full communion with the Anglican Church of Canada.
  • Gee D wrote: »
    The degree of communion between TEC and ECLA is show by the agreement that at the consecration by either of a bishop, at least one of the consecrating bishops will be from the other church - much to be commended. The Porvoo agreement is not as close.

    Cynically, I wonder if the reason for involving Episcopal bishops in ELCA consecrations is less out of joyful ecumenism than a desire to quietly impose apostolic succession on the ELCA, bishop by bishop. I imagine there are some Episcopalians who feel that without apostolic succession, Lutheran orders are not valid.

    (I think it's true that ELCA hasn't historically required apostolic succession? I'm a cradle Episcopalian employed at an ELCA church, so my knowledge of Lutheran theology and practice is piecemeal at best.)

    Certainly our views of what happens at ordination / consecration are very different - my boss tells me that ELCA bishops go back to being regular old pastors after their elected term is over, whereas Episcopal bishops are bishops all the way, from their first crosier thump to their last dyin' day.
  • PDRPDR Shipmate
    Prior to 1980 the LCA and the ALC did not use the title "bishop" - they had national and district presidents. The b-word appeared about the time the merger negotiations became really serious
  • Nick TamenNick Tamen Shipmate
    edited June 2019
    Gee D wrote: »
    The degree of communion between TEC and ECLA is show by the agreement that at the consecration by either of a bishop, at least one of the consecrating bishops will be from the other church - much to be commended. The Porvoo agreement is not as close.

    Cynically, I wonder if the reason for involving Episcopal bishops in ELCA consecrations is less out of joyful ecumenism than a desire to quietly impose apostolic succession on the ELCA, bishop by bishop. I imagine there are some Episcopalians who feel that without apostolic succession, Lutheran orders are not valid.
    Nothing cynical or quiet about it. As I recall, everyone on both sides was pretty open about what was going on. From TEC’s perspective, this arrangement assured that over time, ELCA clergy would be ordained by bishops in the historic episcopate. From ELCA’s perspective, it was a concession to TEC.
    (I think it's true that ELCA hasn't historically required apostolic succession? I'm a cradle Episcopalian employed at an ELCA church, so my knowledge of Lutheran theology and practice is piecemeal at best.)

    Certainly our views of what happens at ordination / consecration are very different - my boss tells me that ELCA bishops go back to being regular old pastors after their elected term is over, whereas Episcopal bishops are bishops all the way, from their first crosier thump to their last dyin' day.
    Right. ELCA (like its predecessor bodies, as @PDR notes), hasn’t historically required apostolic succession. Some Lutherans, such as the Church of Sweden, held on to apostolic succession. Others, like German and American Lutherans, did not. American Lutherans have generally viewed specific forms of church government as adiaphora—something not essential that Lutheran bodies can accept, reject or modify as they think appropriate.

    Some Lutherans also identify “apostolic succession” as being found in the passing on of the teaching of doctrine rather than in the historic episcopate.

    BTW, and FWIW, I think Lutherans (American Lutheran, at least) have traditionally been more likely to talk about “altar and pulpit fellowship” (referring to the ability of pastors of one body to preside at the altars and preach in the pulpits of another body) than about “full communion”—again, until the ELCA.

Sign In or Register to comment.