The Marriage Course

DavidKetelbyDavidKetelby Shipmate Posts: 6
Have just begun co-leading 'The Marriage Course' at a church in the South of England, having been a customer on said course about eighteen years ago now.

I'm interested in others' thoughts about what they've found helpful and unhelpful about this course - from all points of view: customer, co-leader, interested bystander, whatever.

(I may have some perspectives to share, I thought I'd throw the discussion open first).

Comments

  • ArethosemyfeetArethosemyfeet Shipmate, Heaven Host
    Welcome to the ship, @DavidKetelby !

    Is this the HTB-produced one?
  • DavidKetelbyDavidKetelby Shipmate Posts: 6
    Welcome to the ship, @DavidKetelby !

    Is this the HTB-produced one?

    Thank you. And, yes - that's the one I mean.
  • BroJamesBroJames Purgatory Host
    In our setting where for so many couples one or both of them live away, often quite a distance, it hasn’t really been practicable. We have to structure what we can offer in the way of marriage preparation rather differently.
  • CaissaCaissa Shipmate
    M C and my marriage course in the United Church of Canada was pretty useless. My sister's course in the Anglican Church of Canada bordered on the obtrusive. I think some of the questions asked by the priest were rather intimate and inappropriate.
  • TurquoiseTasticTurquoiseTastic Kerygmania Host
    Mrs TQTastic and myself found the HTB Marriage Course quite helpful when we did it a decade and more ago (not at HTB). I would not call it a "preparation" course exactly - we were already married and I think it is ideal for those recently married. Importantly it was very definitely not a "group discussion" thing - the idea is that you talk about the week's topic with your partner and only with your partner. This was its best feature I think. Good elements as I recall included the "how to argue with each other" topic and a surprisingly sensible segment on sex. As I remember it was not at all evangelistic and is definitely worth one's consideration even if you would run a mile from Alpha. All IMHO obviously.
  • Gill HGill H Shipmate
    We did it years ago (after marriage).

    It is of course a product of its environment, and therefore the videos might feel a bit alien to some.

    Provided you ensure that people feel comfortable taking the mickey out of the videos and disagreeing with anything in them if they wish, it’s fine. And yes, it’s not a group discussion, so while you can all be in a group to eat and watch the video, you need to ensure couples can talk unheard afterwards.

    People with children found the opportunity for a free meal with their other half was a huge benefit. (The churches arranged babysitters)

    From what I recall, most of the advice would apply to any long term romantic relationship, not just married people (and not just opposite-sex couples either).
  • ashleyashley Shipmate Posts: 9
    We did it many years ago at our church. The couple that lead it were very honest in explaining that they had neglected their relationship to the point he was almost ready to walk out and leave one night, but something made him stop and reconsider (I can't remember if the Holy Spirit was referenced but was certainly implied). That experience brought them both to a point of saying "hang on a minute", started properly listening and engaging with each other, and got themselves to a much better place.

    So the thrust of it was very much "We're not here to tell you not to get divorced, or to give divorcees a hard time, or to push any kind of idealised picture of marriage - we're here to help you invest in your relationships and make the best of them, whatever your starting point is." Which worked very well for us.
  • TwangistTwangist Shipmate
    edited September 19
    I would echo the positive comments above.
    I would suggest it's only as successful as the conversations the couples have.
    I would think it would be wise to have the option of helpful people to refer couples who are struggling to.
    We've done it twice the more recent videos are better than the old ones certainly in terms of production values.
  • And it's htb so lots of class related issues potentially.
    For instance a weekly "date night" is a great idea if you can afford it plus a baby sitter etc
  • Barnabas62Barnabas62 Shipmate, Host Emeritus
    It’s useful as a framework. I’ve used it a lot of times and went on the HTB training course. It’s not at all like Alpha.

    On the training course, a clergyman from Bristol working on a relatively impoverished council housing estate made a very helpful observation. The videos by Nicky and Sila Lee clearly come from a middle class background and would not work in his council housing environment. What he was going to do was use the framework but not the videos. He would extract the roots from the teaching material but present them in a way more understandable to his audience.

    I think that’s good advice. I thought the book was pretty good. And I did like Nicky and Sila Lee, who struck me as pastorally motivated.
  • TwangistTwangist Shipmate
    An effective tool if it can translated to your context.
    I agree with @Barnabas62 regarding the Lees
  • DavidKetelbyDavidKetelby Shipmate Posts: 6
    During the video for Session 6 ('good sex'), Nicky Lee references this urban legend about Neil Armstrong referencing something overheard in childhood before departing the Moon in July 1969 - only this isn't presented as 'an amusing yet instructive urban legend' but as fact.

    Carelessness (you'd think they could've and would've afforded fact-checkers) or a sense that what's objectively true doesn't matter that much (which would be a worse witness) ..?

    Moreover - and though this is perhaps unrelated, the two are crystallising together in my mind - there's no sense from watching any of the video content that anyone other than cisgender heterosexual people live in this world. This feels like a distorted picture of reality in another sense.

    I'm conscious that - according to the utilitarian calculus of marriages saved, human happiness added to - this may all sound rather churlish.

    'And yet...?'

  • FWIW, speaking as a former professional proofreader, even at the publishing house we didn't hire fact checkers. If the authors screwed up, that was on them. (Not saying I agree with this stance, but it isn't surprising when you consider the actual cost of fact checking, even if you hire at minimum wage (which you shouldn't)).
  • Barnabas62Barnabas62 Shipmate, Host Emeritus

    …..the two are crystallising together in my mind - there's no sense from watching any of the video content that anyone other than cisgender heterosexual people live in this world. This feels like a distorted picture of reality in another sense.

    I'm conscious that - according to the utilitarian calculus of marriages saved, human happiness added to - this may all sound rather churlish.

    'And yet...?'

    I’ve been asked that question.

    I think most of the course would work pretty well for any folks working through the challenges of living in a committed long term relationship.

    But I don’t think it works for folks in an open relationship. The underlying assumption is that the relationship is intended to be exclusive.
  • Can it cope with homosexuality? That's the key question - are we actually acknowledged as existing?
  • PomonaPomona Shipmate
    I know that they've said that gay couples are welcome to attend the course but I suspect the material doesn't touch upon gay couples.
  • Gill HGill H Shipmate
    It’s a long time since I did the course and it may have been updated, but from my recollection it only covered heterosexual relationships. That said, the material could apply to any monogamous relatiomship as far as I remember, particularly if you adapted the material yourself rather than using the videos.
  • DavidKetelbyDavidKetelby Shipmate Posts: 6
    FWIW, speaking as a former professional proofreader, even at the publishing house we didn't hire fact checkers. If the authors screwed up, that was on them. (Not saying I agree with this stance, but it isn't surprising when you consider the actual cost of fact checking, even if you hire at minimum wage (which you shouldn't)).

    Thank you - that's a helpful perspective for me to be hearing about this.
Sign In or Register to comment.