Is this now a rule? I remember the interim ruling being AI generated content could be posted if you acknowledged the usage. I apologize, if I got this wrong or missed a ruling.
May I remind people that the Ship has a policy of no AI generated content.
Dafyd Hell Host
Comments
Dafyd was right that a post referencing ai as a source contravenes current policy, even with identification of the source as ai. I appreciate that interimness of this policy is somewhat confusing.
In a work context I supervise university students on training placements, and I have asked the university for additional information on how they manage ai. If any of that is transferable to our context, once I have it, I may come back to Styx to discuss this further.
Doublethink, Admin
Searching for source documents can be done in a variety of ways, one of which is asking a question. AI is probably not a reliable source of all relevant online resources but it can break the ice.
I got caught out here recently when AI produced contradictory answers to the same question asked slightly differently. I’m not going down that route again.
There have been a number of times when AI and I will get into arguments with each other. I love to prove it wrong.
Why are you volunteering for AI to train itself on you?
Can you detect them?
“I know they’re out there somewhere, somewhere, somewhere. I know they’ll find you somehow, somehow, somehow.”
M-x psychoanalyze-pinhead
I mean, Dead Internet Theory is already here.
My small, niche website would get a few hundred hits a month until early last year, but now it's regularly around a thousand with no feedback. I am sure the robots are just indiscriminately trawling the depths of the internet for photos and useful text.