Ship of Fools: St Anne's Lutheran, London
Ship of Fools: St Anne's Lutheran, London
Bach Vespers as Bach himself would have done it
Read the full Mystery Worshipper report here
Ship of Fools: St Anne's Lutheran, London
Bach Vespers as Bach himself would have done it
Read the full Mystery Worshipper report here
Comments
I'm glad they seem to have settled in at St. Mary-at-Hill (which I also visited once, for a weekday Eucharist, long before the 1988 fire). From photos, the restored interior looks better without the dark furnishings, in my personal opinion, but YMMV, of course!
IJ
They are now in storage, it would be wonderful to have them returned.
Perhaps that's something for the future, as funds permit?
I agree that the reredos would form a better background than the rather neutral grey curtain they have at the moment. The church which was formerly used by the St. Anne's Lutheran congregation had (and presumably still has) a similar reredos:
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTyskAtikssgDWGqJHg7OYMXtWtfdosYdZ5b8DHsqjQNvvHnQbN
IJ
It is a City of London scandal about the oak fittings from St Mary at Hill church - many of them from Wren's time - they should clearly be returned and re-fixed. Why are they not? The church was said to fully insured when it caught fire.
I would hazard a guess that restoration, transport, and re-fitting of the salvaged woodwork would be an expensive job. If so, who is to pay for it (assuming that insurance cover is insufficient)?
And is the woodwork (however fine) really needed for the mission and outreach of a modern 21st Century Lutheran congregation?
How about a contemporary artist being commissioned to create a new backdrop to the sanctuary?
It may or may not be the choice of the Lutheran congregation (actually, I would be surprised if they didnt delight in the idea of the return of the fittings if their landlord, the Diocese of London, got it together to put them back as they are compatible with Lutheran ethos and worship).
But that is not the point: whether they like it or not the Diocese is owner and custodian of the building for present and future generations. If it was under-insured it is their oversight and they should make up the difference. If this were not a church and the building was owned by a company or private individual, the full force of town planning legislation and enforcement would be upon them - but the church, and other faith organisations, have an indefensible opt-out known as <ecclesiastical exemption>. The sooner this anachronistic religious privilege it is done away with the better.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ACF2Ua5wkh8
And here's a more traditional church:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=sZwnrvOk4Dw
It would be interesting to actually hear what the St Anne's congregation at St Mary at Hill thinks about the absence of the original pews etc., rather than engage in fruitless speculation!