Fucking Guns

1555657585961»

Comments

  • It is circulating online that the shooter was transgender, if that turns out to be true, I fear for what this crime will be used to justify.
    From the New York Times:
    Investigators have identified the attacker as Robin Westman, 23, who is believed to be a former student at the school, according to a law enforcement official with knowledge of the investigation. The suspect’s mother is a retired employee of the school, the official said.
    and
    According to court records, Robin Westman’s mother, Mary Grace Westman, submitted a petition to change her child’s name in November 2019. A judge granted the petition in January 2020 and wrote in an order making the name change official, “Minor child identifies as a female and wants her name to reflect that identification.” At the time, Robin Westman was 17.
    I share your fear, @Doublethink.


  • RuthRuth Shipmate
    Charlie Kirk has been shot and killed in Utah. (For those who might not be aware, he was the founder/leader of Turning Point USA, a nonprofit that advocates for conservative views on college campuses, and he was an unofficial advisor to the Trump administration.) He was in the middle of a public event, answering questions about how many trans people have committed mass shootings when he was shot in the neck.

    A couple of years ago, he said:
    I think it's worth it. I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights.
    -- Source: Snopes
  • PomonaPomona Shipmate
    The shooter hit the carotid artery from 100-200 metres away - must be a professional hit. Clearly gun violence in red states is out of control and they should deploy the National Guard in Utah.
  • Alan Cresswell Alan Cresswell Admin, 8th Day Host
    A nasty piece of work who should have been locked up for inciting hatred by public statement of his views. But, the last thing we need in any of our nations is for any of these vile, dangerous scum to become martyrs (especially, as in this case, being shot but even prosecution in courts and fines/imprisonment has that unfortunate effect).
  • LouiseLouise Epiphanies Host
    I was pretty shocked by how he was represented in the news last night - you'd never know he's said a controversial thing let alone some of the extremist hate and prejudice he's come out with. I knew because I had a social media timeline full of Americans talking about it but if you weren't following American politics you'd have no idea from that coverage what sort of person he was.
  • SojournerSojourner Shipmate
    Live by the sword, run the risk of dying accordingly.

    As Alan said, a nasty piece of work.
  • RuthRuth Shipmate
    A nasty piece of work who should have been locked up for inciting hatred by public statement of his views.

    I couldn't disagree more. I don't want to be locked up for my views, including expressing rage at and hatred for the current regime. Just hating people should not be a crime.
  • CaissaCaissa Shipmate
    You have to love the first and second amendments.
  • RuthRuth Shipmate
    I love the first amendment, and I think the second ought to be repealed. Or at minimum properly interpreted, not misreading or ignoring the militia clause.
  • CaissaCaissa Shipmate
    From a Canadian pov the first is far too liberal/permissive but that is a discussion for another thread.
  • RuthRuth Shipmate
    From an American point of view Canadian and British takes on this are well into Orwellian thought crime territory.
  • CaissaCaissa Shipmate
    Understood. Although sharing a large border we have developed different societies/cultures.
  • ArethosemyfeetArethosemyfeet Shipmate, Heaven Host
    Ruth wrote: »
    From an American point of view Canadian and British takes on this are well into Orwellian thought crime territory.

    Only the point of view of Americans who're pig ignorant of Canadian and British takes.
  • RuthRuth Shipmate
    Ruth wrote: »
    From an American point of view Canadian and British takes on this are well into Orwellian thought crime territory.

    Only the point of view of Americans who're pig ignorant of Canadian and British takes.

    Fuck you too!
  • ArethosemyfeetArethosemyfeet Shipmate, Heaven Host
    Ruth wrote: »
    Ruth wrote: »
    From an American point of view Canadian and British takes on this are well into Orwellian thought crime territory.

    Only the point of view of Americans who're pig ignorant of Canadian and British takes.

    Fuck you too!

    Yeah well, you piss and moan constantly about people outside the US having opinions about it so why not lead by example and STFU about things in other countries you clearly don't understand?
  • RuthRuth Shipmate
    Because it doesn't make any difference.
  • Alan Cresswell Alan Cresswell Admin, 8th Day Host
    Ruth wrote: »
    A nasty piece of work who should have been locked up for inciting hatred by public statement of his views.

    I couldn't disagree more. I don't want to be locked up for my views, including expressing rage at and hatred for the current regime. Just hating people should not be a crime.
    Which is why I didn't say anything about his (or your) right to hold whatever views he liked, no matter how much I disagree with them. The issues are with the public statements he has made, which we must assume are an expression of what he actually believes. Statements that incite people to hate others, to the point of denial of their rights (eg: his views on returning to racial segregation) or calling for some people to be killed (eg: he has said that homosexuals should be killed), are what should have had him locked up. It doesn't matter who someone calls others to kill, that's not something anyone should be allowed to say.
  • PomonaPomona Shipmate
    edited 7:53PM
    Ruth wrote: »
    From an American point of view Canadian and British takes on this are well into Orwellian thought crime territory.

    Depends on the Canadian/Brit - I have to say that I don't have a problem with the First Amendment and would certainly appreciate similar protections in the UK. I'd much rather have that than the way wealthy people can bully people via the courts here for hurting their feelings. I don't think it's incompatible with protections for marginalised people, lots of states have comprehensive protections.

    I don't have a problem with gun ownership per se either, especially in a country like the US that has Actual Wilderness with Actual Dangerous Animals. I don't think regular people should have assault weapons etc, but hunting for food for eg is no problem imo. There are lots of rural liberal hunters in the US.
Sign In or Register to comment.