<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Uk — Ship of Fools</title>
        <link>http://forums.shipoffools.com/index.php?p=/</link>
        <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 01:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
        <language>en</language>
            <description>Uk — Ship of Fools</description>
    <atom:link href="http://forums.shipoffools.com/index.php?p=/discussions/tagged/uk/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
        <title>A question about the Trump &amp; Vance meeting with Zelensky</title>
        <link>http://forums.shipoffools.com/index.php?p=/discussion/6299/a-question-about-the-trump-vance-meeting-with-zelensky</link>
        <pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2025 21:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Purgatory</category>
        <dc:creator>Enoch</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">6299@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[There is a discussion on the hell forum about Donald Trump. It has reacted very vociferously to the meeting last Friday. I was the first person to do so, and I stand by what I said there.  However, virtually everybody who has posted there in the last two days has been from the UK. Donald Trump was already pretty unpopular here. I don't know whether this will surprise shipmates in the USA, or even elsewhere in the world, but by their behaviour, both Trump and Vance have drawn down almost universal disgust upon themselves over here. Non-Brits may not pick up how significant this reference is, but even the Daily Mail agrees.<br />
<br />
Now, my question is not 'what do you think of Messrs Trump and Vance?' I am fully aware that most transatlantic shipmates already don't like them. There is plenty of scope to express views on them on the 'Donald ******* Trump' thread.<br />
<br />
My question is more curiosity as to what peoples' reactions to this meeting elsewhere in the world and especially, what can shipmates in the USA tell the rest of us about the state of public opinion there. That is not necessarily 'what do you think about it?' - though that is interesting - so much as how does that sort of behaviour play in your country. As a general principle, it doesn't play well here at all. Deliberately humiliating somebody else in public, taking advantage of power to cause them to lose face, is usually a huge no-no, one that is very likely to backfire on the perpetrator, as it has done on both of them here. It has left me wondering if there really is a cross-cultural disjunction here, even possibly a non-comprehension. Is that sort of thing less unacceptable because it could be defended as straight-talking, the verbal equivalent of carrying a firearm and being prepared to use it?<br />
<br />
This is a serious query and I have deliberately put it in Purgatory so as to avoid hellish discussion. As far as I am concerned, that belongs in the other thread.<br />
<br />
]]>
        </description>
    </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
