Mind you, on a slightly more serious note (but only just) would the burning of cannabis in church reduce the virulence of The Dreaded Plague (Covid-19)?
After all, incense is good for fumigating the church...
Bishop's Finger, I think smoking marijuana in a church or synagogue or a mosque would spread Covid-19 all over the place. Most people, even long-term smokers of pot, cough and cough when inhaling the smoke. And that kind of coughing is quite intense. There's no delicate little coughing into one's shirt sleeve or a mask. Serious hacking and gasping are prevalent. Even before the coronavirus, I couldn't smoke pot at all. I have asthma and if I start coughing, I may be doing it for hours.
Ick! Think of all that microscopic crud in the air.
Bishop's Finger, I think smoking marijuana in a church or synagogue or a mosque would spread Covid-19 all over the place. Most people, even long-term smokers of pot, cough and cough when inhaling the smoke. And that kind of coughing is quite intense. There's no delicate little coughing into one's shirt sleeve or a mask. Serious hacking and gasping are prevalent. Even before the coronavirus, I couldn't smoke pot at all. I have asthma and if I start coughing, I may be doing it for hours.
Ick! Think of all that microscopic crud in the air.
I may be wrong, but I imagine @Bishops Finger was picturing the hash being swung around in a thurible. Would there be competition to be the thurifer?
I heard a lovely story once about how in an African country where smoking hash was predominately a backward and rural vice, a detachment of police were sent to burn a crop that a villager had been caught growing in his field. As the smoke and flames got higher, so did the police.
@Enoch - the hash would be in the 'regular' thurible, along with the incense, unless that proved a problem, in which case we could use a separate thurible (we have 2 or 3 spares...).
Before you get too enthusiastic, cannabis allergy (link) does exist and is not minor for those who have it (my daughter). In some cases it leads to anaphylaxis. Personally, I'd rather not find out how prevalent it is in your congregation the hard way.
I think contemporary social and, in many places, legal mores would dictate that you shouldn't smoke anything in a public indoor space. So that would rule out weed in church.
In countries where there are constitutional or legal rights over freedom of religion, how about 'I'm using this for worship and so it's my right to burn this stuff'?
I don't think it would work here, as I have a feeling, but can't trace any record, that the Rastafarians have already tested that one.
I think contemporary social and, in many places, legal mores would dictate that you shouldn't smoke anything in a public indoor space. So that would rule out weed in church.
I wonder if the "No Smoking" rule, if strictly applied, would forbid the use of incense?
I remember going to St David's Cathedral many years ago where (at that time anyway) the worship seemed fairly High but did not include incense. When I enquired of the sidesman afterwards he said, "We can't - it sets off the smoke alarms".
Not if they are hard-wired, as I would expect a Cathedral's to be. Imagine having to find which alarm was beeping then climbing up to change the battery?
More to the point perhaps, wouldn't it invalidate the insurance?
However London Transport neutralised the safety systems on the Circle Line a few years ago when they ran a steam train ... https://tinyurl.com/y9cqcj8a
Also it would take a ridiculous amount of something like Rosa Mystica to mask the smell of the cannabis. Enough to give the average church treasurer palpitations at the incense bill.
Incense is worse than cigarette smoke and should be banned. I would have thought it a particular hazard to choirs. Remember Roy Castle, the trumpet player who never smoked but played in smoky clubs?
"On average, it produces PM greater than 45 mg/g burned, as compared to 10 mg/g burned for the cigarettes.."
"...exposure to significant amounts of incense PM could result in a higher risk of oxidative DNA adducts (27.4-32.8 times) than tobacco PM. The generation and subsequent inhalation of PM during church activities may therefore pose significant risks in terms of respiratory health effects. "
Comments
We already use incense, so it shouldn't be too hard to introduce...umm...an extra ingredient...
I was waiting for someone to say that...
Well done, Sir!
Mind you, on a slightly more serious note (but only just) would the burning of cannabis in church reduce the virulence of The Dreaded Plague (Covid-19)?
After all, incense is good for fumigating the church...
Enquiring minds need to know.
Ick! Think of all that microscopic crud in the air.
I heard a lovely story once about how in an African country where smoking hash was predominately a backward and rural vice, a detachment of police were sent to burn a crop that a villager had been caught growing in his field. As the smoke and flames got higher, so did the police.
I don't think it would work here, as I have a feeling, but can't trace any record, that the Rastafarians have already tested that one.
I remember going to St David's Cathedral many years ago where (at that time anyway) the worship seemed fairly High but did not include incense. When I enquired of the sidesman afterwards he said, "We can't - it sets off the smoke alarms".
"Lift up your hearts"
"liftin' way high, man"
Not if they are hard-wired, as I would expect a Cathedral's to be. Imagine having to find which alarm was beeping then climbing up to change the battery?
However London Transport neutralised the safety systems on the Circle Line a few years ago when they ran a steam train ... https://tinyurl.com/y9cqcj8a
"On average, it produces PM greater than 45 mg/g burned, as compared to 10 mg/g burned for the cigarettes.."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2377255/
"...exposure to significant amounts of incense PM could result in a higher risk of oxidative DNA adducts (27.4-32.8 times) than tobacco PM. The generation and subsequent inhalation of PM during church activities may therefore pose significant risks in terms of respiratory health effects. "
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21831441/