In Other News The University of Idaho Murders

Gramps49Gramps49 Shipmate
Two years ago, before the Winter Break at University of Idaho, four students who lived just off campus were brutally murdered in their apartment. The alleged murder, Brian Kohlberger, who was a graduate student in Criminology at Washington State University was arrested shortly there after after he had returned to his family home in Pennsylvania over the break. Let's just say the evidence was pretty incriminating NBC Dateline has a special on what they had. Since the special may not meet the liable laws of the United Kingdom or the European Union, I am not providing a link.

Idaho is a death penalty state and the state was pushing for it, but the Kohberger lawyers were fighting it all the way.

Well, today, Kohberger accepted a plea deal offered by the state for four life sentences without possibility of parole or appeal. He accepted.

Needless to say, at least one of the victims' families is very upset.

Here is an AP summary report of the plea deal. https://apnews.com/article/kohberger-idaho-students-killed-91eeb98eebd3d9b007e4a5cae0f81030

Just posting it to keep those who were following the trial elsewhere informed.

Comments

  • stetsonstetson Shipmate
    I don't support the death penalty, but I guess if the bereaved in this case do, it's understandable they'd be ticked off about the deal.
  • Gramps49Gramps49 Shipmate
    stetson wrote: »
    I don't support the death penalty, but I guess if the bereaved in this case do, it's understandable they'd be ticked off about the deal.
    .
    I sent a note to one of the victims' family through Facebook. I told them I was very sorry for their terrible loss and unending grief. However, I thought a trail and death penalty would even be more traumatic not only for them, but for everyone involved in the trial. And every time he would make an appeal, it would only retraumatize everyone. I thought it would be the best for this monster (I used the term in the note to them} to be locked away for the rest of his life with no chance of appeal or probation. They will still have a chance to give him their all during the sentencing and to let him have it. They will continue to grieve for the rest of their lives I know.
  • North East QuineNorth East Quine Purgatory Host
    @Gramps49 , it is not clear what it is that you want to discuss here. Purgatory is for serious debate, not for posting updates for those who were following the trial. Please clarify the issue under discussion.

    North East Quine, Purgatory host
  • RuthRuth Shipmate
    @Gramps49, do you know these folks personally?
  • Gramps49Gramps49 Shipmate
    edited 2:42PM
    Could discuss the pro's and con's of pleading guilty vs the state seeking the death penalty, though I think I know the outcome of the discussion on this board.

    Question: Could there be a time when the death penalty should be the preferred option.
    Ruth wrote: »
    @Gramps49, do you know these folks personally?

    Do I know you personally?
  • RuthRuth Shipmate
    edited 3:24PM
    Gramps49 wrote: »
    Ruth wrote: »
    @Gramps49, do you know these folks personally?

    Do I know you personally?

    That's not an answer.

    If someone I didn't know personally wrote to me at a time when I was suffering tremendous loss -- in public no less -- to offer me an opinion about what I should do, I would not be the least bit open to hearing them. I doubt you did anything but add to their pain.

    Someone should say those things to them, but it should be someone they know really well.
  • BurgessBurgess Shipmate Posts: 21
    There's no death sentences in Canada. There's hearings for people who get life which means 25 years. There's hearings for people who get dangerous offender sentences that don't end. That means lifers and dangerous can get out. Everyone who talks without knowning who the person killed or raped mostly says they are against death penalty. When you know the person maybe you would find yourself against death in your mind and in reality you would want them dead. This is what we got to in talking circles. Talking circles are our traditional ways. Here's one pretty good guide to talking circle: https://www.learnalberta.ca/content/aswt/talkingtogether/facilitated_talking_circle_fact_sheet.html
  • PomonaPomona Shipmate
    Ruth wrote: »
    Gramps49 wrote: »
    Ruth wrote: »
    @Gramps49, do you know these folks personally?

    Do I know you personally?

    That's not an answer.

    If someone I didn't know personally wrote to me at a time when I was suffering tremendous loss -- in public no less -- to offer me an opinion about what I should do, I would not be the least bit open to hearing them. I doubt you did anything but add to their pain.

    Someone should say those things to them, but it should be someone they know really well.

    Yes indeed. I am certainly against the death penalty, but it is beyond inappropriate to send a message to a stranger who is grieving to tell them why they're wrong.
  • Gramps49Gramps49 Shipmate
    edited 5:30PM
    Pomona wrote: »
    Ruth wrote: »
    Gramps49 wrote: »
    Ruth wrote: »
    @Gramps49, do you know these folks personally?

    Do I know you personally?

    That's not an answer.

    If someone I didn't know personally wrote to me at a time when I was suffering tremendous loss -- in public no less -- to offer me an opinion about what I should do, I would not be the least bit open to hearing them. I doubt you did anything but add to their pain.

    Someone should say those things to them, but it should be someone they know really well.

    Yes indeed. I am certainly against the death penalty, but it is beyond inappropriate to send a message to a stranger who is grieving to tell them why they're wrong.

    First of all, this was on their facebook page. A number of pro and con messages were on their page, so I was not the first. They did encourage responses too.

    Then too, I acknowledged the depth of their grief. And I did not specifically say they were wrong for wanting the death penalty. I just pointed out an alternative way of thinking through this tragedy. This morning CBS carried a report on this. They interviewed a father of one of the other victims who said he was relieved that his family will not have to go through a full trial and the continual appeals process if the court accepts the plea. And they interviewed the man whose Facebook page I responded to.

    BTW--the judge handling the case has the option of rejecting the plea deal, but it very unusual. Could happen in this case because at least one of the families said they had not been consulted.

    As Doublethink pointed out, the social media platforms foster a social familiarity between persons even when there is no direct contact between them. It happens even on this board. Ruth and I have argued many times over the years here, but we do not have any direct contact between us.

    Personally, I would hope all the families involved will hire a media consultant for themselves to handle the firestorm of responses they are no doubt receiving.
  • RuthRuth Shipmate
    Gramps49 wrote: »
    As Doublethink pointed out, the social media platforms foster a social familiarity between persons even when there is no direct contact between them. It happens even on this board. Ruth and I have argued many times over the years here, but we do not have any direct contact between us.

    Don't ever feel free to tell me what I should do in a painful situation. Ever.
  • NicoleMRNicoleMR Shipmate
    For what it's worth, my family did have a double murder, of my cousin and her daughter, back in 1999. They were killed by her husband. My aunt, the victims' mother/grandmother, was adamant she did not want the death penalty, and all other concerned parties (including me) agreed. The killer got two life sentences with no chance of parole. (He was murdered in his cell two years ago) So not every bereaved family wants death.
  • stetsonstetson Shipmate
    Ruth wrote: »
    Gramps49 wrote: »
    As Doublethink pointed out, the social media platforms foster a social familiarity between persons even when there is no direct contact between them. It happens even on this board. Ruth and I have argued many times over the years here, but we do not have any direct contact between us.

    Don't ever feel free to tell me what I should do in a painful situation. Ever.

    Me neither. Nothing worse than pontifications from someone who's not suffering the same thing you are.

    That said, as far as the Facebook page in question goes, I'll assume that @Gramps49 picked up the mood of the place well enough to know that his counsel would be welcome. Because at the end of the day, I can't prove otherwise.
  • Nick TamenNick Tamen Shipmate
    Gramps49 wrote: »
    As Doublethink pointed out, the social media platforms foster a social familiarity between persons even when there is no direct contact between them. It happens even on this board. Ruth and I have argued many times over the years here, but we do not have any direct contact between us.
    No, but you have developed a relationship on these boards, fostered by participating together in discussions on a wide variety of topics, including personal ones, over a long period of time. That kind of discussion has enabled all of us who’ve been here for any time and participated with any regularity to learn about each other and get to know each other—and often trust and feel friendship for one another—despite not knowing each others’ real names (usually) or what we look like (usually).

    I don’t think Facebook, where anyone can comment on a post*, is at all comparable in that regard. Where relationships are present on Facebook, they are, at least in my experience, almost always relationships that were formed and exist outside Facebook, with Facebook simply serving to facilitate communication within that relationship.

    Social familiarity is not the same as relationship, and confusing the two is, I think, problematic.


    * Facebook is about commenting on posts, not about discussion.


Sign In or Register to comment.