Denominational collaboration in times past

This is inspired by the sub-theme (polite name for a tangent!) on an Ecclesiantics thread where denominationalism came up.

I suggested that this was largely a 19th century concept, although anticipated of course by earlier 'Dissenting' sects. I use the word 'sect' in a sociological rather than pejorative sense.

The discussion reminded me that one of my great-great-grandfathers was a prominent and very active Baptist minister from West Wales.

He pastored congregations across South Wales and on several occasions in parts of England. He would have been bilingual of course.

My brother has found a fair bit about him from contemporary newspaper accounts in Welsh and English and from chapel histories.

There is a memorial to him in a chapel he founded and where he was due to give the inaugural sermon but for his death from TB.

Anyway... I was struck by the presence of Anglican clergy at several of his inaugural services when he took on new pastorates.

How common would this have been in the late 19th century?

I do know that the London Missionary Society (LMS) was multi-denominational.

We tend to see the mid to late 19th centuries as a time of intense denominational rivalries. Yet I sense this us only part of the story.

Has anyone got any insight into ecumenical collaboration during this period?

Comments

  • CrœsosCrœsos Shipmate
    We tend to see the mid to late 19th centuries as a time of intense denominational rivalries. Yet I sense this us only part of the story.

    Has anyone got any insight into ecumenical collaboration during this period?

    I'm not sure if this counts as collaboration or rivalry, but I remember reading of a U.S. Congressional debate around the establishment of what came to be known as American Indian boarding schools, with various denomination vying to make sure they got "their share" of Native Americans and various Congressmen currying favor by assuring each denomination they would be included. So I guess that counts as ecumenical collaboration in eradicating Native American cultures and religions.
  • Lamb ChoppedLamb Chopped Shipmate
    I think you're looking for official or semi-official collaboration, and it's been far too many years since I did the history on these things, so I'm no help. But I can say that it was almost certainly the same on an informal basis back then as it is now--which is to say, if there are various flavors of Christian outreach work in one area, you all borrow from each other, and lend freely--and refer people to each other as necessary. The work is too great to allow of handling things any other way--if you care about the outcome, I mean. And surely they do, if they're risking their lives.
  • North East QuineNorth East Quine Purgatory Host
    The Church of Scotland minister in my parish "came out" at the Disruption of 1843. A new Free Church and manse were built in the village, and the old minister was replaced by another Church of Scotland minister in the church and manse he had vacated.

    Relations between the two ministers were extremely cordial, not least because one of the Free Church minister's sons was married to one of the C of S minister's daughters, and they shared a set of grandchildren.
  • Conversely, Robin Gill's book "The Myth of the Empty Church" suggests that, in expanding urban areas at least, the denominations were in hot competition with each other in the latter part of the 19th century.
  • Sure. I'm just wondering whether that was always the case.
  • Jengie JonJengie Jon Shipmate
    Here you are an example where it was not the case https://sheffieldurc.wordpress.com/our-history/
  • chrisstileschrisstiles Hell Host
    Conversely, Robin Gill's book "The Myth of the Empty Church" suggests that, in expanding urban areas at least, the denominations were in hot competition with each other in the latter part of the 19th century.

    Does he comment how that translated locally though? (Which is where I suspect much collaboration goes on).
  • Jengie Jon wrote: »
    Here you are an example where it was not the case https://sheffieldurc.wordpress.com/our-history/

    Interesting. My late wife's sister and my brother-in-law attend the Methodist church nearby.
  • On the issue of Anglican clergy attending the induction service/s of my Baptist minister ancestor, I find that interesting as 19th century Anglicans could be very snooty towards 'Dissenters'. Some still are. Sadly.

    I wonder whether they were called on to speak or simply observe?
  • Nick TamenNick Tamen Shipmate
    edited July 9
    German settlers began arriving in large numbers in North Carolina in the mid-18th Century. Most* of them were either Lutheran or German Reformed, and it soon became the norm for the Lutherans and the German Reformed to join together to erect a “union church” (and perhaps a “union school”). Both communities contributed funds and labor, and they would alternate Sundays for services. They might even share clergy.

    By the latter part of the 19th Century, congregations became more established and often had more resources, so union churches gave way to separate churches for the Lutherans and German Reformed. But in the Piedmont region of North Carolina, where German settlement was concentrated, one can still see legacy of union churches, as the local Lutheran church and the local German Reformed** church will have the same name.


    * German settlers also included Moravians, but because of their particular way of forming and organizing communities, they established separate settlements from other Germans.

    ** In 1934, the Reformed Church in the United States, the main German Reformed body, merged with the Evangelical Synod of North America, a primarily Midwestern group with a mixed Lutheran-Reformed heritage, to form the Evangelical and Reformed Church. In 1957, the ERC merged with American Congregationalists to form the United Church of Christ. As a result, the historically German Reformed congregations in North Carolina that were once part of union churches with the Lutherans are now UCC congregations.

    Interestingly, the UCC is now in full communion with the Lutheran denomination to which most if not all of those formerly Lutheran partners in union churches now belong, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America. (The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) and the Reformed Church in America (the American descendant of the Dutch Reformed) are also part of that full communion agreement.)


  • chrisstileschrisstiles Hell Host
    Nick Tamen wrote: »
    ** In 1934, the Reformed Church in the United States, the main German Reformed body, merged with the Evangelical Synod of North America, a primarily Midwestern group with a mixed Lutheran-Reformed heritage

    Although the source for the latter was originally German immigrants with a background in the Prussian Union of Churches.
  • Nick TamenNick Tamen Shipmate
    Nick Tamen wrote: »
    ** In 1934, the Reformed Church in the United States, the main German Reformed body, merged with the Evangelical Synod of North America, a primarily Midwestern group with a mixed Lutheran-Reformed heritage

    Although the source for the latter was originally German immigrants with a background in the Prussian Union of Churches.
    Right, I was just trying not to go into even more detail.

    The German settlers in North Carolina, both Lutheran and Reformed (who were part of what became the Reformed Church in the United States), who formed the union churches were primarily from the Palatinate.


  • Jengie JonJengie Jon Shipmate
    Decided to check something out and this might give a better flavour of what happened on a small scale locally https://raggedschoolchesterfield.wordpress.com/essay/

    Please note the ecumenism of the actors, quite happy to be Congregational Elders and Salvation Army Superintendents. In other words I suspect at least among those from the Independent tradition, people served according to where they felt called and not according to their denomination.
  • HarryCHHarryCH Shipmate
    In the US, the United Methodist Church was formed in 1968 by the merger of the Methodist Church and the Evangelical United Brethren. This require mergers of local churches, and I remember attending a church in which the merger was not a happy one; some people left.
  • My impression of any major church change is that there are some folks who just can't stretch to cover the new, no matter how much good will they may have. We had people come up and tell us so, back in 2000 when we joined a pair of English-speaking and Vietnamese-speaking congregations together. It was utterly necessary, and they knew it; and they wished us well; but it wasn't for them.
  • PuzzlerPuzzler Shipmate
    Indeed, there are those who insist on telling you, even if they attend a different denomination regularly, that they are staunch Methodists/ Baptists/ Anglicans etc.
Sign In or Register to comment.