Ship of Fools

href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_headship" rel="nofollow">Federal Headship</a> (which is by no means exclusively about theological matters) makes clear.<br

href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_headship" rel="nofollow">federal headship</a>. Do you find anything in this theory to take issue with? (NB - again - it makes

'above' the wife.<br />I know that 'headship' does not necessarily mean 'above' but it is difficult to see how treating the Trinity as if they are linked in a 'Chain of Command' is what Paul in

should alert us to the fact that all that headship, haircuts and veils stuff shouldn't have been there, because that then makes it <i>'the first place issue'</i> that Paul would be writin

is expressing a very similar understanding of headship to 1 Cor 11:3.<br />But if you think it is post Pauline, then I guess you can argue that the later Ephesians 5:23 has been back edited int

this scripture is whether Paul's comments on headship are typical of his thinking, or some kind of isolated view.<br />I'm going to have a dig around. My gut feel, having read Elaine Storkey a