Purgatory: Oops - your Trump presidency discussion thread.

1146147149151152168

Comments

  • I kind of have a feeling (based on nothing) that he may not return to Washington after Christmas in Florida, or that he may leave some time in early January (still not conceding!). His stuff will be packed up by whoever does those things normally -- hopefully in time for a thorough cleaning, disinfecting, and "de-bugging" of the entire White House.
  • But...if there are Bigly Maga Rallies in the New Year, won't he have to be in Washington, to greet the millions of adoring devotees?
  • (Well as long as he doesn’t turn up here in Scotland!)
  • Quick, O Scotland! Nationalise his golf course!
    :wink:
  • Ethne AlbaEthne Alba Shipmate
    edited November 2020
    Mr Alba, when driving past it today , was heard to mutter something about a lorry park......

    I really think we should avoid driving on that road as my beloved gets frightfully cross then his driving standards dip just a little


    But yes, alert the borders!
  • No, no. Kent is the place for lorry parks, where they are known as *Farage's Garages*...
  • As an outsider looking in ..... how does this handover business end tho?

    Is it waiting until the lawsuits run out of steam?

    Transition by boredom?
  • In one sense, I suppose it ends in January, when President Biden takes over, no matter what Trump and his supporters might say or do to the contrary. The current lawsuits appear mostly to be dead in the water, anyway.

    As to further lawsuits, there's an item on the BBC website about the half-dozen quite nasty legal actions awaiting Trump once he becomes a private citizen again.
  • Ethne Alba wrote: »
    As an outsider looking in ..... how does this handover business end tho?

    Is it waiting until the lawsuits run out of steam?

    Transition by boredom?
    I looked it up. and it seems that 20 January is the official date. The custom has been to begin the transition within a day or is of the election. However, there is nothing mandating that the loser has to help, as far as I am aware
  • CrœsosCrœsos Shipmate
    edited November 2020
    lilbuddha wrote: »
    I looked it up. and it seems that 20 January is the official date. The custom has been to begin the transition within a day or is of the election. However, there is nothing mandating that the loser has to help, as far as I am aware

    The loser of the election, personally and specifically, isn't required to help. There are, however, several legal requirements of various government agencies that still answer to Trump. For example:
    A Trump administration appointee is refusing to sign a letter allowing President-elect Joe Biden’s transition team to formally begin its work this week, in another sign the incumbent president has not acknowledged Biden’s victory and could disrupt the transfer of power.

    The administrator of the General Services Administration, the low-profile agency in charge of federal buildings, has a little-known role when a new president is elected: to sign paperwork officially turning over millions of dollars, as well as give access to government officials, office space in agencies and equipment authorized for the taxpayer-funded transition teams of the winner.

    It amounts to a formal declaration by the federal government, outside of the media, of the winner of the presidential race.

    But by Sunday evening, almost 36 hours after media outlets projected Biden as the winner, GSA Administrator Emily Murphy had written no such letter. And the Trump administration, in keeping with the president’s failure to concede the election, has no immediate plans to sign one. This could lead to the first transition delay in modern history, except in 2000, when the Supreme Court decided a recount dispute between Al Gore and George W. Bush in December.

    That article was written eight days ago. As of today, Emily Murphy still has not signed that letter or released those transition funds.

    President-elect Biden has also not started receiving the Presidential Daily Briefing from the intelligence community, nor has he been allowed any contact with (or briefing by) the coronavirus task force.

    Over at Lawyers, Guns, and Money, Paul Campos connects a few interesting dots about this GSA saga.
    Here’s another little thing to keep an eye on, in the context of the looting that’s undoubtedly taking place right now all over the Trump administration:

    The Former Presidents Act, provides, among other things, that former presidents can rent office space at taxpayer expense after leaving office (This is a terrible law, which ought to be revoked or significantly reformed, but that’s a discussion for another day).

    The way this gets negotiated is that in their last days in office former presidents submit requests to the GSA regarding suitable space, and this creates the baseline for annual requests going forward. (The FPA specifically allows the rented space to be privately owned).

    Currently there’s an informal understanding that it’s OK for a former president to spend around a half million per year renting office space at taxpayer expense. Figures for FY2019: Clinton $513K, GWB, $500K, Obama, $542K (Again this is absurd, but leave that aside for the moment. Typically, Jimmy Carter is spending only $117K on office space).

    Hey, I wonder who will be the landlord taking in the rent for Donald Trump’s taxpayer-provided post-presidential offices, and what that rent will be? I bet you can come up with some creative guesses as to exactly what cosy little arrangement Emily Murphy is going to approve, before she’s scuttles off to whatever wingnut welfare sinecure will offer her shelter from the storm.

    Wheels within wheels.
  • As far as the (non) transition goes, I'm just glad that this won't be Biden's first rodeo. He's had experience with transitions from both sides, and is probably best placed to make up for lost time of anybody we could have had. A first-timer would have been adrift.
  • As far as the (non) transition goes, I'm just glad that this won't be Biden's first rodeo. He's had experience with transitions from both sides, and is probably best placed to make up for lost time of anybody we could have had. A first-timer would have been adrift.

    I've thought the same thing, Lamb Chopped. (He also has a close relationship with Trump's predecessor, which will be a big help.)
  • I am wondering if Biden might get the Federal Courts to compel the Trump administration to participate in a transition.
  • Gramps49 wrote: »
    I am wondering if Biden might get the Federal Courts to compel the Trump administration to participate in a transition.
    There might not be a mechanism for this because no one thought anyone actually reaching that office would be that mental.
  • Gramps49 wrote: »
    I am wondering if Biden might get the Federal Courts to compel the Trump administration to participate in a transition.
    He might be waiting for the necessary number of states to certify their results. At the latest that would be December 8. In the meantime try to get Republican senators to put pressure on the White House (Biden's other advantage is he does know the Senate) so they don't have to go that route.

  • Lamb ChoppedLamb Chopped Shipmate
    edited November 2020
    I suspect he's waiting for the electoral college to do its Thang on Dec 14*, which will basically wipe out any before-going shenanigans about vote recounts and the like. Up to that point, he can let mere pressure of time and worldwide opinion do their work. Indeed, the longer Trump behaves as he is doing, the more discredited he will be in the eyes of anybody not wholly enslaved to his cult--which could be a boon to the new administration as they try to pick up the pieces.

    * to be sure, they aren't officially counted on that day, but on January 6. But from all I can remember, they are known then.
  • I am not privavy to the minds or machinations of the Republican senators, but the Georgia runoffs don't happen until Jan 5. Do not expect to see any Republican cooperation until after the last vote is cast and counted.
  • I do very much hope that one of the early priorities of the incoming administration will be to codify/convince Congress to codify, whatever, the norms around presidential elections--such as when the GSLA MUST begin working with the new administration, regardless of the old one's desires. And probably work with the states to clean up the issues around faithless electors, which are only half-completed. I am weary of this foolishness.
  • Nick TamenNick Tamen Shipmate
    edited November 2020
    Golden Key wrote: »
    Evidently, there was a delayed transition between Clinton and Bush 43. (That seems vaguely familiar, but I don't remember it.)
    That delayed transition included hanging chads and recounts in the decisive state of Florida, which prevented knowing whether Bush or Gore had a majority of electoral votes until a SCOTUS decision on December 12, 2000. :wink:

  • BroJamesBroJames Purgatory Host
  • Golden KeyGolden Key Shipmate, Glory
    Nick--

    Thx. Knew that; but, somehow, I wasn't connecting that with "transition period".
  • Golden KeyGolden Key Shipmate, Glory
    BroJames--

    I think maybe it's the General Services Administration, or some facet thereof. That's the place that should be shelling out transition money to Joe & Co.
  • Golden Key wrote: »
    Nick--

    Thx. Knew that; but, somehow, I wasn't connecting that with "transition period".
    I figured. :wink:

  • I do very much hope that one of the early priorities of the incoming administration will be to codify/convince Congress to codify, whatever, the norms around presidential elections--such as when the GSLA MUST begin working with the new administration, regardless of the old one's desires. And probably work with the states to clean up the issues around faithless electors, which are only half-completed. I am weary of this foolishness.
    If the Senate remains republican, that will not happen. If the Senate flips...it still won't happen.
    The sloppy nature is a feature, not a bug, as far as legislators are concerned. It is only "bad" when being used against one's position.
  • CrœsosCrœsos Shipmate
    edited November 2020
    lilbuddha wrote: »
    If the Senate remains republican, that will not happen. If the Senate flips...it still won't happen.
    The sloppy nature is a feature, not a bug, as far as legislators are concerned. It is only "bad" when being used against one's position.

    It should be noted that regardless of what happens in the Georgia special elections the Senate will still be controlled by Republicans when Congress meets to certify the electoral votes on January 6. Even if we assume that Ossoff and Warnock win their elections on January 5 in such a decisive manner that they can both be sworn in the next day, the Senate will still be divided 50/50 and the tie-breaking vote will be . . . Mike Pence, whose term as vice president doesn't end until January 20.
  • Barnabas62Barnabas62 Shipmate, Host Emeritus
    Well, there's a thing. Yet another Hail Mary. Except ... doesn't a refusal to confirm mean that Trump and Pence are out, Joe and Kamala are out, and Nancy Pelosi gets the job? I think I read that somewhere. There are some pretty arcane contingency provisions in this process.
  • Golden KeyGolden Key Shipmate, Glory
    Barnabas--

    I admit part of me hope that happens. Even if Nancy Pelosi is only president for a day, while things are getting sorted out.
    :)
  • BoogieBoogie Heaven Host
    edited November 2020
    The madness of King Trump, America's sulky George III sequel -

    https://tinyurl.com/y4ou3wyq
  • Chuck Grassley (R, Iowa, 87) has tested positive for coronavirus.
  • Boogie wrote: »
    The madness of King Trump, America's sulky George III sequel -

    https://tinyurl.com/y4ou3wyq

    Boy, it said at the credits that this guy is a comedy writer. This was almost too close to reality to be comedy.
  • Golden KeyGolden Key Shipmate, Glory
    Re concession speech link:

    :applause:

    That is AWESOME!

    :happydance:

    Thx for the link, Croesos!!!
  • Photoshopped.
  • Golden KeyGolden Key Shipmate, Glory
    It's a cut-and-paste by Jimmy Fallon's "Tonight Show". Not supposed to be taken as a real speech.
  • Golden Key wrote: »
    It's a cut-and-paste by Jimmy Fallon's "Tonight Show". Not supposed to be taken as a real speech.

    Yes, I know.

  • Golden KeyGolden Key Shipmate, Glory
    Ok. But commenting "Photoshopped", and nothing else, sounded like you were writing it off as something made up. IME, that's the main use of the term.
  • Barnabas62Barnabas62 Shipmate, Host Emeritus
    Analysing jokes kills them stone dead.

    Anyway, it made this Host’s day!

    :mrgreen:
  • Golden KeyGolden Key Shipmate, Glory
    :)
  • I guess stating the obvious is not funny on this message board. Sorry.
  • A guy moves into a logging camp, and the first night the men are all sitting around the dining hall, and one of them yells out "One hundred and thirty four!" and they all howl with laughter. Things quiet down and then somebody in the corner shouts, "Seventeen!" and they all crack up.

    The new guy asks the person next to him what's going on. "We only know so many jokes, and after a while it got easier to just number them. Then instead of telling the whole joke, you can just call out the number, and people will know which joke you mean."

    The new guy ponders, and then shouts out, "Ninety-four!" Silence. Then everybody goes back to chatting quietly.

    "What happened?" the new guy asks his new acquaintance.

    "Well, I guess some people know how to tell 'em, and some just don't."
  • Golden KeyGolden Key Shipmate, Glory
    LOL. The version I know has a prison, rather than a logging camp. I think I like this version better. Don't have to feel as sorry for the characters.
  • Golden KeyGolden Key Shipmate, Glory
    Don Jr. tested positive for Covid, and said he's going to spend his quarantine time cleaning guns and watching Netflix.

    Long article from US version of The Sun. It reviews who at the WH has had it, plus relevant topics. IMHO, it wanders a bit.
  • Golden Key wrote: »
    Don Jr. tested positive for Covid, and said he's going to spend his quarantine time cleaning guns and watching Netflix.

    Is that a euphemism? Should someone go and do a wellness check on Don, Jr.?
  • Golden KeyGolden Key Shipmate, Glory
    edited November 2020
    They should stand away from the doors and windows when doing it.

    ETA: Animals should also stay away. He's a hunter. The article said he's holed up some place, and suggested he might be at his very large hunting preserve.
  • Gramps49 wrote: »
    I guess stating the obvious is not funny on this message board. Sorry.

    Well, when the item in question is ALREADY a joke to begin with, there's nothing particularly funny about describing the mechanism used to achieve it. (By way of analogy, a horror movie does not become scarier when the person watching it with me says "They're using jump-cuts in this scene.")

    Now, if the photoshopping in the item was particularly bad, and you said "Makes me nostalgic for the doctored photos of Stalinist Russia", that might be kinda funny, because you're using an insult to comment on the low quality of the work.

  • re logging camp story: the version I heard was that the new chap said, "238", and all the other fellers fell about laughing. "that's great", commented an old-timer, "We haven't heard that one before".
    Perhaps Trump should start enumerating his lies, so he can stand up in front of his followers and just say, "42", and the sheeple chant, "Lock her up!", or better, perhaps, "64!"
  • ArethosemyfeetArethosemyfeet Shipmate, Heaven Host
    RockyRoger wrote: »
    re logging camp story: the version I heard was that the new chap said, "238", and all the other fellers fell about laughing. "that's great", commented an old-timer, "We haven't heard that one before".
    Perhaps Trump should start enumerating his lies, so he can stand up in front of his followers and just say, "42", and the sheeple chant, "Lock her up!", or better, perhaps, "64!"

    And the biggest joke of them all... 45!
  • stetson wrote: »
    Gramps49 wrote: »
    I guess stating the obvious is not funny on this message board. Sorry.

    Well, when the item in question is ALREADY a joke to begin with, there's nothing particularly funny about describing the mechanism used to achieve it.
    It also don’t help if you get that mechanism wrong. This was a video, not a photograph or image. It was cut-and-spliced, not photoshopped.

  • FWIW, it was well done, especially if you listen only to the almost seamless soundtrack!

    BTW, where is Trump? The Grauniad says he's gone AWOL, with no public appearances, and is sulking monumentally whilst the country he's supposed to lead is ravaged by Ye Pestilence. He seems to be represented in the meeja by his court jester Giuliani (he of the running hair dye)...
  • BTW, where is Trump? The Grauniad says he's gone AWOL, with no public appearances, and is sulking monumentally whilst the country he's supposed to lead is ravaged by Ye Pestilence.

    Don't worry, Steve Mnuchin is on it (via Twitter).
    Pedro Nicolaci da Costa
    "We're working on mass distribution of the virus," Treasury Secretary Mnuchin tells CNBC, presumably meaning the vaccine.
    gonelikehellmachine
    i don’t know why you would presume that, this is objectively what they have been doing for months and they’ve been very successful at it

    That's what used to be called a Kinsley gaffe back in the Before Time.
Sign In or Register to comment.