There is only one utterly devastating consequence, ELE. By full nuclear exchange. I don't see that ever happening by miscalculation. Including 0.1% equivalent worst case global warming in a century or three.
Does anybody bother to read these links? @Martin54 claimed that the "only one utterly devastating consequence" of a renewed cold war style conflict was Busta Rhymes' 1998 solo album, not an extinction event as commonly understood (and which has its own Wikipedia entry). That was ridiculous blathering and, as such, required ridicule in response. I'm under no obligation to take @Martin54's claims more seriously than he apparently takes them.
Comments
But I'm intrigued why @Crœsos is Satanic in reaction to that?
Cut it out, @Martin54. If you mean "adversarial" why not say "adversarial" in plain English, rather than "Satanic"?
This is a discussion board. It's not a "let's all admire Martin's genius and ability to obfuscate" board.
Hostly hat off
North East Quine, Purgatory host
It's an honor, @Martin54 . Thank you.
That wasn't my reference, it was @Martin54's.
Does anybody bother to read these links? @Martin54 claimed that the "only one utterly devastating consequence" of a renewed cold war style conflict was Busta Rhymes' 1998 solo album, not an extinction event as commonly understood (and which has its own Wikipedia entry). That was ridiculous blathering and, as such, required ridicule in response. I'm under no obligation to take @Martin54's claims more seriously than he apparently takes them.