Paparazzi pics of sad politicos sign death warrants?

Is this really a thing? Apparently, there's a tradition of paparazzi taking pictures of British politicians in cars being sad, and apparently this is some kind of cultural sign of their impending social demise?

I'm questioning the veracity of this observation, but it's an intriguing idea.
For observers of British politics, this viral photo seemed to signal that Starmer’s end could soon be approaching. “Once a photograph is published of a PM looking sad or distraught in a car,” British researcher and developer Laurence Day wrote, “the entire nation starts hearing the Countdown Clock jingle ending in their resignation.”
Indeed, the Starmer picture is part of an evidently long and established tradition in the British press and cultural imagination of politicians and royals appearing at their lowest. Dubbed the “snatched backseat car photo” by the BBC, its history stretches all the way back to an iconic image taken of Margaret Thatcher shedding tears as she left No. 10 by car for the final time. “Deeply fascinated by this distinctively British genre of photography,” reads one viral tweet that shows Starmer alongside similar pics of former Prime Minister Theresa May (looking teary and deflated), Prince Philip (looking like he didn’t have long left), and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor (looking villainous and double-chinned). As the photos went viral, Josh Billinson, a social media editor at Semafor, posed a simple question: “Why doesn’t this genre of photo exist in America?”

Comments

  • chrisstileschrisstiles Hell Host
    Bullfrog wrote: »
    Is this really a thing? Apparently, there's a tradition of paparazzi taking pictures of British politicians in cars being sad, and apparently this is some kind of cultural sign of their impending social demise?

    I think there's less respect for the office from a particular type of British journalist compared to their American colleagues, but I feel the causation is around the wrong way. It's a sign that journos think a particular person is on the way out/has reduced power of access and it's safe to get their licks in.
  • BullfrogBullfrog Shipmate
    edited May 1
    I now wonder if American politicians have gotten so obsessively good at protecting themselves that it's bloody hard to get any access. Or that our body politic has gotten so cynically supine that we just take it for granted that our leaders are crooks.

    That's a fair take. That a picture of this makes headlines is itself a sign of weakness, and the publishers of the newspaper might have a sense that the "leader" is weak enough that they can be mocked with impunity? Interesting!
  • ArethosemyfeetArethosemyfeet Shipmate, Heaven Host
    Politicians, including the PM, are routinely mocked with impunity. This is the country that spawned Spitting Image.
  • stetsonstetson Shipmate
    In conjunction with the possible trans-pond variations in accessibility of high-level politicians, I think there also might be a conformation bias at work. If it's easy to get photos of British politicians in cars, then the law of averages would seem to dictate that at least a few of the shots will show them at low points.
  • Gramps49Gramps49 Shipmate
    It is said McGovern lost the election because he would occasionally become teary eyed. People took that to mean he would have been to soft for being a president.
  • Thing is, we don't need a photo of Starmer looking pissed off to know his days are numbered.
  • stetsonstetson Shipmate
    edited May 1
    Gramps49 wrote: »
    It is said McGovern lost the election because he would occasionally become teary eyed. People took that to mean he would have been to soft for being a president.

    I was trying to think of non-British equivalents to the unflattering car photos, and one of the first that I thought of was Muskie crying in the snow over the Canuck Letter. But, of course, that was at a press conference related to the issue in question, not a random car trip.
  • BullfrogBullfrog Shipmate
    Gramps49 wrote: »
    It is said McGovern lost the election because he would occasionally become teary eyed. People took that to mean he would have been to soft for being a president.

    Wasn't he the guy who was photographed riding in a tank trying to look macho?
  • stetsonstetson Shipmate
    Bullfrog wrote: »
    Gramps49 wrote: »
    It is said McGovern lost the election because he would occasionally become teary eyed. People took that to mean he would have been to soft for being a president.

    Wasn't he the guy who was photographed riding in a tank trying to look macho?

    That was Dukakis, '88.

    McGovern in '72 supposedly walked into a kosher deli and asked for a hot dog and a glass of milk.
  • BullfrogBullfrog Shipmate
    stetson wrote: »
    Bullfrog wrote: »
    Gramps49 wrote: »
    It is said McGovern lost the election because he would occasionally become teary eyed. People took that to mean he would have been to soft for being a president.

    Wasn't he the guy who was photographed riding in a tank trying to look macho?

    That was Dukakis, '88.

    McGovern in '72 supposedly walked into a kosher deli and asked for a hot dog and a glass of milk.

    Right, thanks for clarifying. In my defense, I was a small child at the time and learned about the anecdote in college.

    Le sigh... :neutral:
Sign In or Register to comment.